Operational losses and environmental flow recovery in a multi-irrigation districts river Basin, evidence from Iran’s arid central plateau

This study introduces a systematic technical–environmental appraisal framework that links off-farm operation to environmental flow recovery (EFR) potential in watersheds containing multiple irrigation districts (IDs)The analysis focuses on the surface-water distribution infrastructure within the IDs and, specifically, on off-farm agricultural water management. It considers interconnected open-canal networks, a manual operating system, and the associated standard operating procedures (SOPs). The framework is demonstrated in Iran’s arid central plateau, where six IDs operate in a basin with a long record of environmental water-rights violations linked to agricultural withdrawals. To quantify operational losses, integrated hydraulic–operational models were developed by coupling an integrator–delay hydraulic simulation model with IDs’ SOP logic. The models were calibrated and verified for all six IDs. The technical assessment indicates that daily water losses caused by operational failures and inefficiencies vary markedly across operating conditions. Under normal to severe shortage scenarios, these losses account for 6.5–17.3% and 21.5–31.1% of the supplied surface water, respectively. To estimate the EFR recovery potential, the study applied an flow-duration-curve (FDC)-shifting approach together with the Global Environmental Flow Calculator (GEFC). Under the best-case scenario, 61 MCM yr⁻¹ can be recovered from operational losses and returned to the river, which corresponds to 45.16% of the flow deficit required to satisfy class F. Even under the most severe shortage scenario, 13 MCM yr⁻¹ (9.63% of the class F deficit) remains recoverable. Overall, the proposed framework is transferable to similar multi-ID watersheds and provides technical evidence to support licensing decisions for off-farm system automation, enabling basin authorities, licensing agencies, and irrigation-district managers to audit operational losses, define diversion-reduction targets at diversion dams, and operationalize compliance monitoring for environmental-flow releases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Challenges
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101402
Primary Topic
Hydraulic flow and structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operational losses and environmental flow recovery in a multi-irrigation districts river Basin, evidence from Iran’s arid central plateau

Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany, Farhad Behzadi
Environmental Challenges
Hydraulic flow and structures
article

Operational losses and environmental flow recovery in a multi-irrigation districts river Basin, evidence from Iran’s arid central plateau

Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany, Farhad Behzadi
article en

Abstract

This study introduces a systematic technical–environmental appraisal framework that links off-farm operation to environmental flow recovery (EFR) potential in watersheds containing multiple irrigation districts (IDs)The analysis focuses on the surface-water distribution infrastructure within the IDs and, specifically, on off-farm agricultural water management. It considers interconnected open-canal networks, a manual operating system, and the associated standard operating procedures (SOPs). The framework is demonstrated in Iran’s arid central plateau, where six IDs operate in a basin with a long record of environmental water-rights violations linked to agricultural withdrawals. To quantify operational losses, integrated hydraulic–operational models were developed by coupling an integrator–delay hydraulic simulation model with IDs’ SOP logic. The models were calibrated and verified for all six IDs. The technical assessment indicates that daily water losses caused by operational failures and inefficiencies vary markedly across operating conditions. Under normal to severe shortage scenarios, these losses account for 6.5–17.3% and 21.5–31.1% of the supplied surface water, respectively. To estimate the EFR recovery potential, the study applied an flow-duration-curve (FDC)-shifting approach together with the Global Environmental Flow Calculator (GEFC). Under the best-case scenario, 61 MCM yr⁻¹ can be recovered from operational losses and returned to the river, which corresponds to 45.16% of the flow deficit required to satisfy class F. Even under the most severe shortage scenario, 13 MCM yr⁻¹ (9.63% of the class F deficit) remains recoverable. Overall, the proposed framework is transferable to similar multi-ID watersheds and provides technical evidence to support licensing decisions for off-farm system automation, enabling basin authorities, licensing agencies, and irrigation-district managers to audit operational losses, define diversion-reduction targets at diversion dams, and operationalize compliance monitoring for environmental-flow releases.

Environmental ChallengesVol. 22
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Hydraulic flow and structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.