‘What’s the Fucking Point of This?’: Addressing Student Attitudes towards Quantitative Methods in Sociology for Enhanced Graduate Outcomes

Quantitative methods (QM) are characterised as ‘hard to teach’ and often marginalised in undergraduate Sociology curricula particularly in the UK, due to many factors, including students’ attitudes towards numbers. This can lead QM to be viewed by students as not mainstream Sociology. This article argues that QM can support Sociology graduate futures due to clear transferable skills. But QM must be taught in a way that does not ‘trigger’ students’ negative dispositions towards the subject. This article, using the example of a large introductory undergraduate QM module, outlines a pedagogic approach that addresses students’ attitudes to QM, while building learner confidence. Key elements of this approach to QM include storytelling, relevance, support and value. This article ends with a discussion of the efficacy of this framework based on a two-year evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251401409
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘What’s the Fucking Point of This?’: Addressing Student Attitudes towards Quantitative Methods in Sociology for Enhanced Graduate Outcomes

Liz Cain, Simon Massey, Carla Cordner, Sophie Harris et al.
Sociology
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
article

‘What’s the Fucking Point of This?’: Addressing Student Attitudes towards Quantitative Methods in Sociology for Enhanced Graduate Outcomes

Liz Cain, Simon Massey, Carla Cordner, Sophie Harris, Nazneen Ismail, Julie Scott Jones
article en

Abstract

Quantitative methods (QM) are characterised as ‘hard to teach’ and often marginalised in undergraduate Sociology curricula particularly in the UK, due to many factors, including students’ attitudes towards numbers. This can lead QM to be viewed by students as not mainstream Sociology. This article argues that QM can support Sociology graduate futures due to clear transferable skills. But QM must be taught in a way that does not ‘trigger’ students’ negative dispositions towards the subject. This article, using the example of a large introductory undergraduate QM module, outlines a pedagogic approach that addresses students’ attitudes to QM, while building learner confidence. Key elements of this approach to QM include storytelling, relevance, support and value. This article ends with a discussion of the efficacy of this framework based on a two-year evaluation.

Sociology
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.