Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation reduces hospital cost of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage management: secondary analysis of the NAVSaH trial

Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) accounts for only 5% of strokes in the United States but imposes substantial economic burdens on healthcare systems, with hospitalization costs exceeding $90,000 per patient. This study evaluated the economic implications of incorporating transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) into standard aSAH management.Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the Non-invasive Auricular Vagus nerve stimulation for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (NAVSaH) trial, a single-center trial enrolling adult patients with spontaneous SAH, randomized 1:1 to receive either taVNS or sham stimulation. Cost data were sourced from institutional accounting databases. The primary economic outcomes included total hospitalization costs, resource utilization across service lines, and 30-day readmission rates. Cost and utilization analyses were stratified by Hunt and Hess grades and compared between the treatment arms.Results: The taVNS group (n=13) had lower 30-day hospitalization costs than the sham group (n=14) ($82,632 vs. $103,998, P=0.003), representing a 20.54% reduction. Resource utilization was lower in the taVNS than the sham group for multiple service areas, including respiratory (17.00 vs. 64.60 charges per patient, P=0.003), laboratory (112.23 vs. 140.36 charges per patient, P<0.001), and pharmacy services (266.54 vs 313.29 charges per patient, P=0.004). Additionally, the taVNS group had lower 30-day readmission rates (7.7% vs. 28.6%) and readmission costs ($2,716 vs. $13,085).Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that taVNS reduces hospital costs and service utilization in patients with aSAH. Multicenter validation is warranted; however, these findings suggest that taVNS offers a novel strategy for improving resource utilization and costs in critical care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurocritical Care
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18700/jnc.250014
Primary Topic
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation reduces hospital cost of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage management: secondary analysis of the NAVSaH trial

Anna L. Huguenard, Andrew Pierce, Karan Joseph, Alan Dow et al.
Journal of Neurocritical Care
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
article

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation reduces hospital cost of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage management: secondary analysis of the NAVSaH trial

Anna L. Huguenard, Andrew Pierce, Karan Joseph, Alan Dow, Jason Gagné, Michael Olufawo, Matthew Greever, Mahendra Gupta, Eric C Leuthardt
article en

Abstract

Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) accounts for only 5% of strokes in the United States but imposes substantial economic burdens on healthcare systems, with hospitalization costs exceeding $90,000 per patient. This study evaluated the economic implications of incorporating transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) into standard aSAH management.Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the Non-invasive Auricular Vagus nerve stimulation for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (NAVSaH) trial, a single-center trial enrolling adult patients with spontaneous SAH, randomized 1:1 to receive either taVNS or sham stimulation. Cost data were sourced from institutional accounting databases. The primary economic outcomes included total hospitalization costs, resource utilization across service lines, and 30-day readmission rates. Cost and utilization analyses were stratified by Hunt and Hess grades and compared between the treatment arms.Results: The taVNS group (n=13) had lower 30-day hospitalization costs than the sham group (n=14) ($82,632 vs. $103,998, P=0.003), representing a 20.54% reduction. Resource utilization was lower in the taVNS than the sham group for multiple service areas, including respiratory (17.00 vs. 64.60 charges per patient, P=0.003), laboratory (112.23 vs. 140.36 charges per patient, P<0.001), and pharmacy services (266.54 vs 313.29 charges per patient, P=0.004). Additionally, the taVNS group had lower 30-day readmission rates (7.7% vs. 28.6%) and readmission costs ($2,716 vs. $13,085).Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that taVNS reduces hospital costs and service utilization in patients with aSAH. Multicenter validation is warranted; however, these findings suggest that taVNS offers a novel strategy for improving resource utilization and costs in critical care settings.

Journal of Neurocritical CareVol. 18(2)
Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.