Using Large Language Models for In Silico Development and Simulation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Cataract Surgery with Various Intraocular Lenses: A Pre-Validation Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in ophthalmology is limited by high patient burden during early validation. We propose an In Silico Pre-validation Framework using Large Language Models (LLMs) to stress-test instruments before clinical deployment. <b>Methods:</b> The LLM generated a PROM questionnaire and a synthetic cohort of 500 distinct patient profiles via a Python-based pipeline. Profiles were instantiated as structured JSON objects with detailed attributes for demographics, lifestyle, and health background, including specific clinical parameters like IOL type (Monofocal, Multifocal, EDOF) and dysphotopsia severity. To eliminate memory bias, a stateless simulation approach was used for test-retest reliability; AI agents were re-instantiated without access to prior conversation history. Psychometric validation included Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using WLSMV estimation and Differential Item Functioning (DIF). <b>Results:</b> The model demonstrated excellent fit (CFI = 0.962, TLI = 0.951, RMSEA = 0.048, SRMR = 0.063), confirming structural validity. DIF analysis detected no significant bias based on age, sex, or IOL type (0/20 items flagged). Internal consistency was robust (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80) and stateless test-retest reliability was high (ICC > 0.90), indicating stability independent of algorithmic memory. Convergent validity was established via significant correlations with NEI-VFQ-25 scores (Spearman's: -0.425 to -0.652,). While responsive to change, known-groups validity reflected realistic clinical overlap. <b>Conclusions:</b> LLM-based pre-validation effectively mirrors complex human response patterns through "algorithmic fidelity." By identifying structural failure points in silico, this framework ensures PROMs are robust and unbiased before clinical trials, reducing the ethical and logistical burden on real-world populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010283
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Large Language Models for In Silico Development and Simulation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Cataract Surgery with Various Intraocular Lenses: A Pre-Validation Study

Justyna Izdebska, Joanna Przybek-Skrzypecka, Ewelina Trojacka, Janusz Skrzypecki et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Using Large Language Models for In Silico Development and Simulation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Cataract Surgery with Various Intraocular Lenses: A Pre-Validation Study

Justyna Izdebska, Joanna Przybek-Skrzypecka, Ewelina Trojacka, Janusz Skrzypecki, Jacek P. Szaflik, Abdullah Azhar, Musa Aamir Qazi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in ophthalmology is limited by high patient burden during early validation. We propose an In Silico Pre-validation Framework using Large Language Models (LLMs) to stress-test instruments before clinical deployment. <b>Methods:</b> The LLM generated a PROM questionnaire and a synthetic cohort of 500 distinct patient profiles via a Python-based pipeline. Profiles were instantiated as structured JSON objects with detailed attributes for demographics, lifestyle, and health background, including specific clinical parameters like IOL type (Monofocal, Multifocal, EDOF) and dysphotopsia severity. To eliminate memory bias, a stateless simulation approach was used for test-retest reliability; AI agents were re-instantiated without access to prior conversation history. Psychometric validation included Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using WLSMV estimation and Differential Item Functioning (DIF). <b>Results:</b> The model demonstrated excellent fit (CFI = 0.962, TLI = 0.951, RMSEA = 0.048, SRMR = 0.063), confirming structural validity. DIF analysis detected no significant bias based on age, sex, or IOL type (0/20 items flagged). Internal consistency was robust (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80) and stateless test-retest reliability was high (ICC > 0.90), indicating stability independent of algorithmic memory. Convergent validity was established via significant correlations with NEI-VFQ-25 scores (Spearman's: -0.425 to -0.652,). While responsive to change, known-groups validity reflected realistic clinical overlap. <b>Conclusions:</b> LLM-based pre-validation effectively mirrors complex human response patterns through "algorithmic fidelity." By identifying structural failure points in silico, this framework ensures PROMs are robust and unbiased before clinical trials, reducing the ethical and logistical burden on real-world populations.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(1)
Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Międzyleski Szpital Specjalistyczny w Warszawie (PL), University of Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.