Limitations of NLR×GDF-15 as a Predictor of Major Adverse Events after CABG: Methodological Concerns

Recent studies have examined the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), used alone or in combination, for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The authors concluded that NLR×GDF-15 has moderate prognostic ability. Although the idea of combining biomarkers is attractive, we highlight its significant limitations: small sample size, lack of validation and calibration, arbitrary transformation of biomarkers, short follow-up period, heterogeneous endpoint definitions, lack of comparison with established risk scores, and the confounding effect of renal function. Current methodological standards (TRIPOD+AI, PROBAST+AI) emphasize the importance of rigorous validation and transparency. Until larger multicenter studies confirm these findings, NLR×GDF-15 should not be considered a reliable prognostic marker in CABG patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Open Medical Journal
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15275/rusomj.2025.0412
Primary Topic
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limitations of NLR×GDF-15 as a Predictor of Major Adverse Events after CABG: Methodological Concerns

Karim Hnid
Russian Open Medical Journal
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
article

Limitations of NLR×GDF-15 as a Predictor of Major Adverse Events after CABG: Methodological Concerns

Karim Hnid
article en

Abstract

Recent studies have examined the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), used alone or in combination, for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The authors concluded that NLR×GDF-15 has moderate prognostic ability. Although the idea of combining biomarkers is attractive, we highlight its significant limitations: small sample size, lack of validation and calibration, arbitrary transformation of biomarkers, short follow-up period, heterogeneous endpoint definitions, lack of comparison with established risk scores, and the confounding effect of renal function. Current methodological standards (TRIPOD+AI, PROBAST+AI) emphasize the importance of rigorous validation and transparency. Until larger multicenter studies confirm these findings, NLR×GDF-15 should not be considered a reliable prognostic marker in CABG patients.

Russian Open Medical JournalVol. 14(4)
Régie Autonome Multi Services D'Agadir (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.