“Center bias” is lower in more unequal local contexts

• Local inequality shapes perceptions of people’s own position in income distribution • Contexts shape opportunities for upward and downward social comparison. • We match survey data with contextual data on local Gini coefficients and average income • The “center bias” is lower in more unequal municipalities We examine the relationship between local income inequality and people’s misperception that they are in the middle of the national income distribution (“center bias”). Local contexts shape perceptions of inequality by influencing the availability of opportunities for upward and downward social comparisons. Four mechanisms could link local inequality to perceptions of one’s relative income position: exposure versus segregation and contrast versus assimilation. We supplement geo-referenced survey data with context information and show that higher local inequality is associated with lower “center bias” (“exposure” mechanism). There is no clear evidence that respondents feel richer in richer contexts (“assimilation” mechanism).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112799
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Center bias” is lower in more unequal local contexts

Felix Wolter, Claudia Diehl
Economics Letters
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

“Center bias” is lower in more unequal local contexts

Felix Wolter, Claudia Diehl
article en

Abstract

• Local inequality shapes perceptions of people’s own position in income distribution • Contexts shape opportunities for upward and downward social comparison. • We match survey data with contextual data on local Gini coefficients and average income • The “center bias” is lower in more unequal municipalities We examine the relationship between local income inequality and people’s misperception that they are in the middle of the national income distribution (“center bias”). Local contexts shape perceptions of inequality by influencing the availability of opportunities for upward and downward social comparisons. Four mechanisms could link local inequality to perceptions of one’s relative income position: exposure versus segregation and contrast versus assimilation. We supplement geo-referenced survey data with context information and show that higher local inequality is associated with lower “center bias” (“exposure” mechanism). There is no clear evidence that respondents feel richer in richer contexts (“assimilation” mechanism).

Economics LettersVol. 260
University of Konstanz (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Center bias” is lower in more unequal local contexts — Felix Wolter, Claudia Diehl · Economics Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS