Evaluation of the retromandibular transparotid approach for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condylar and subcondylar fractures: A clinical observational study

Background: Mandibular condylar fractures constitute nearly one-third of all mandibular fractures and, if inadequately treated, may result in significant functional and anatomical sequelae. While closed reduction has traditionally been preferred, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) through the retromandibular transparotid approach (RMA) provides direct visualization, stable fixation, and anatomical accuracy. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and post-operative outcomes of the RMA in the management of condylar and subcondylar fractures. Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical observational study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharatpur Hospital. Twelve patients with condylar neck or subcondylar fractures underwent ORIF through the RMA. Clinical and radiographic data were analyzed for operative access, duration, mouth opening, occlusion, facial nerve function, scarring, and complications. Results: The patients (10 males and two females; mean age was 36.3 years, range 21–56 years) showed excellent functional recovery. The mean post-operative interincisal opening improved to 28.6±4.8 mm (P=0.001). All patients achieved satisfactory occlusion intraoperatively; one patient developed a minor occlusal discrepancy, which was corrected with selective intermaxillary fixation. No cases of transient or permanent facial nerve weakness, wound dehiscence, infection, salivary fistula, or sialocele were observed. Scars were esthetically acceptable, with no patients reporting visible marks during follow-up. Conclusion: The RMA provides excellent access and visualization for anatomical reduction and rigid fixation of condylar fractures. It ensures favorable functional and esthetic outcomes with minimal complications, establishing it as a safe and reliable technique for managing condylar and subcondylar fractures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v17i1.4958
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the retromandibular transparotid approach for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condylar and subcondylar fractures: A clinical observational study

Suraksha Shrestha, Srijana Dwa, Suresh Kumar Pradhan, Santosh Kumar Yadav
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Evaluation of the retromandibular transparotid approach for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condylar and subcondylar fractures: A clinical observational study

Suraksha Shrestha, Srijana Dwa, Suresh Kumar Pradhan, Santosh Kumar Yadav
article en

Abstract

Background: Mandibular condylar fractures constitute nearly one-third of all mandibular fractures and, if inadequately treated, may result in significant functional and anatomical sequelae. While closed reduction has traditionally been preferred, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) through the retromandibular transparotid approach (RMA) provides direct visualization, stable fixation, and anatomical accuracy. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and post-operative outcomes of the RMA in the management of condylar and subcondylar fractures. Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical observational study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharatpur Hospital. Twelve patients with condylar neck or subcondylar fractures underwent ORIF through the RMA. Clinical and radiographic data were analyzed for operative access, duration, mouth opening, occlusion, facial nerve function, scarring, and complications. Results: The patients (10 males and two females; mean age was 36.3 years, range 21–56 years) showed excellent functional recovery. The mean post-operative interincisal opening improved to 28.6±4.8 mm (P=0.001). All patients achieved satisfactory occlusion intraoperatively; one patient developed a minor occlusal discrepancy, which was corrected with selective intermaxillary fixation. No cases of transient or permanent facial nerve weakness, wound dehiscence, infection, salivary fistula, or sialocele were observed. Scars were esthetically acceptable, with no patients reporting visible marks during follow-up. Conclusion: The RMA provides excellent access and visualization for anatomical reduction and rigid fixation of condylar fractures. It ensures favorable functional and esthetic outcomes with minimal complications, establishing it as a safe and reliable technique for managing condylar and subcondylar fractures.

Asian Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 17(1)
College of Medical Sciences (NP), B.P. Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.