Optimizing Psychological Treatment for Pain After Breast Cancer Using a Randomized Factorial Design: A Feasibility Study

Psychological treatment has shown promising results in the treatment of pain after breast cancer (BC) but could benefit from treatment optimization. The present mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of delivering components drawn from third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy to women with persistent pain after BC using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST). Using a factorial experimental design, women with pain after BC were randomized to eight experimental conditions consisting of either zero, one, two, or three treatment components, namely Mindful Attention, Decentering, and Values and Committed Action. Primary outcomes of pain intensity and pain interference, secondary outcomes, and presumed change processes were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at post-intervention. The study took place at The Department of Psycholog and Behaviorual Sciences at Aarhus University in Aarhus, Denmark, and all sessions and interviews were conducted online. Thirty-four women were included. Three dropped out, and one withdrew consent and was excluded from all analyses. Qualitative manifest content analysis indicated no major barriers to treatment engagement, validity of treatment components, and overall participant satisfaction. No absolute increases in pain outcomes or significant adverse effects associated with any treatment components were observed. The study results indicate that the project procedures and treatment components are acceptable, valid, and safe, and illustrate how an optimized intervention for pain after BC can be developed using MOST. We therefore recommend proceeding with a larger scale trial to evaluate the effects of the individual and combined treatment components. Trial Registration: NCT04841928 [ClinicalTrials.gov].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.70063
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Psychological Treatment for Pain After Breast Cancer Using a Randomized Factorial Design: A Feasibility Study

Yoon Frederiksen, Maja Johannsen, Robert Zachariae, Anders Bonde Jensen et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Optimizing Psychological Treatment for Pain After Breast Cancer Using a Randomized Factorial Design: A Feasibility Study

Yoon Frederiksen, Maja Johannsen, Robert Zachariae, Anders Bonde Jensen, Mia Skytte O’Toole, Christoffer Johansen, Kate Guastaferro, I. Egerod, Anne Speckens, Annika von Heymann, Cecilie Rask Buskbjerg, Caroline Cecilie Nørskov
article en

Abstract

Psychological treatment has shown promising results in the treatment of pain after breast cancer (BC) but could benefit from treatment optimization. The present mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of delivering components drawn from third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy to women with persistent pain after BC using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST). Using a factorial experimental design, women with pain after BC were randomized to eight experimental conditions consisting of either zero, one, two, or three treatment components, namely Mindful Attention, Decentering, and Values and Committed Action. Primary outcomes of pain intensity and pain interference, secondary outcomes, and presumed change processes were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at post-intervention. The study took place at The Department of Psycholog and Behaviorual Sciences at Aarhus University in Aarhus, Denmark, and all sessions and interviews were conducted online. Thirty-four women were included. Three dropped out, and one withdrew consent and was excluded from all analyses. Qualitative manifest content analysis indicated no major barriers to treatment engagement, validity of treatment components, and overall participant satisfaction. No absolute increases in pain outcomes or significant adverse effects associated with any treatment components were observed. The study results indicate that the project procedures and treatment components are acceptable, valid, and safe, and illustrate how an optimized intervention for pain after BC can be developed using MOST. We therefore recommend proceeding with a larger scale trial to evaluate the effects of the individual and combined treatment components. Trial Registration: NCT04841928 [ClinicalTrials.gov].

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Regionshospitalet Herning (DK), Danish Pain Research Center (DK), New York University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.