Flexural Strength of Different Restorative Materials Used for Direct Restoration in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study

Composite resins remain the most durable option for pediatric restorations in stress-bearing areas, whereas RMGICs provide a compromise between mechanical performance and biological advantages such as fluoride release and biocompatibility. Conventional GICs, despite their lower flexural strength, retain clinical relevance in low-load sites and for patients at a high risk of caries. Material selection in pediatric dentistry should therefore be tailored to the child's age, tooth location, and functional demands to ensure long-lasting, minimally invasive restorations. This study involved only mechanical properties alone, and biological aspects, such as fluoride release and biocompatibility, were not considered. Material selection in pediatric dentistry should therefore take into account mechanical requirements, restorative location, and clinical environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomimetics
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics11010016
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexural Strength of Different Restorative Materials Used for Direct Restoration in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study

Carolina Cojocariu, Luminița Ligia Vaida, Diana Marian, Ioana Elena Lile et al.
Biomimetics
Dental materials and restorations
article

Flexural Strength of Different Restorative Materials Used for Direct Restoration in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study

Carolina Cojocariu, Luminița Ligia Vaida, Diana Marian, Ioana Elena Lile, Andra-Alexandra Stăncioiu, Ciprian Pasca
article en

Abstract

Composite resins remain the most durable option for pediatric restorations in stress-bearing areas, whereas RMGICs provide a compromise between mechanical performance and biological advantages such as fluoride release and biocompatibility. Conventional GICs, despite their lower flexural strength, retain clinical relevance in low-load sites and for patients at a high risk of caries. Material selection in pediatric dentistry should therefore be tailored to the child's age, tooth location, and functional demands to ensure long-lasting, minimally invasive restorations. This study involved only mechanical properties alone, and biological aspects, such as fluoride release and biocompatibility, were not considered. Material selection in pediatric dentistry should therefore take into account mechanical requirements, restorative location, and clinical environment.

BiomimeticsVol. 11(1)
University of Oradea (RO), Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Flexural Strength of Different Restorative Materials Used for Direct Restoration in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study — Carolina Cojocariu, Luminița Ligia Vaida, et al. · Biomimetics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS