Balanced Strengths Questionnaire (FORTE): Psychometric Properties

Background: The present study aims to develop a short scale of strengths, which states that strengths would be more adaptive when used in a balanced way. We consider that strengths are dimensional scales in which the balanced scores are related to the optimal functioning of the individual. Methods: The questionnaire measures 26 balanced strengths and was applied to two samples of 851 and 909 participants, with mean ages of 37.66 (SD = 11.11) and 44.15 (SD = 8.27), respectively. Results: The results show that the best-fitting model is a hierarchical factor structure with a general factor of optimal functioning, and four primary order factors that are interrelated: emotional strengths, interpersonal strengths, intellectual strengths and transcendence strengths. The reliability of the scale is adequate (α = 0.853). It is not influenced by social desirability, presents factorial invariance in terms of sex and age, and is positively related to Life Satisfaction. The results provided cross-validation. Conclusions: The study provides a new tool to measure strengths, especially indicated for contexts where the amount of time to apply the measurement must be reduced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/bp47757
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balanced Strengths Questionnaire (FORTE): Psychometric Properties

Dafne null Cataluña, Juan null Nieto, Jesús null Privado
Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Balanced Strengths Questionnaire (FORTE): Psychometric Properties

Dafne null Cataluña, Juan null Nieto, Jesús null Privado
article en

Abstract

Background: The present study aims to develop a short scale of strengths, which states that strengths would be more adaptive when used in a balanced way. We consider that strengths are dimensional scales in which the balanced scores are related to the optimal functioning of the individual. Methods: The questionnaire measures 26 balanced strengths and was applied to two samples of 851 and 909 participants, with mean ages of 37.66 (SD = 11.11) and 44.15 (SD = 8.27), respectively. Results: The results show that the best-fitting model is a hierarchical factor structure with a general factor of optimal functioning, and four primary order factors that are interrelated: emotional strengths, interpersonal strengths, intellectual strengths and transcendence strengths. The reliability of the scale is adequate (α = 0.853). It is not influenced by social desirability, presents factorial invariance in terms of sex and age, and is positively related to Life Satisfaction. The results provided cross-validation. Conclusions: The study provides a new tool to measure strengths, especially indicated for contexts where the amount of time to apply the measurement must be reduced.

Behavioral Psychology/Psicología ConductualVol. 33(3)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Centre for Higher Education (DE), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Balanced Strengths Questionnaire (FORTE): Psychometric Properties — Dafne null Cataluña, Juan null Nieto, et al. · Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS