Evaluation of research group visibility, governance, and engagement in the top 500 global universities

Introduction This exploratory quantitative study examines how the visibility of Research Groups (RGs) is structured, supported, and applied across the QS Top 500 universities (2026), reflecting a global shift toward research groups that serve society rather than solely academic prestige. Methods The analysis investigates the presence of formal governance frameworks, dedicated resources, visibility, interdisciplinary and international collaboration, student involvement, and external engagement with industry, government, and communities. It also compares patterns across global regions and between top-200 and 201–500 ranked universities. Results Findings revealed that while most universities host RGs with defined leaders, themes, and student participation, fewer than 40% employ formal policies or centralized oversight. Less than half of RGs build active partnerships beyond academia, secure external funding, or systematically share their achievements publicly. Mid-ranked universities display higher RG visibility and structured integration than many elite universities, which often rely on legacy laboratories and reputation rather than formal group frameworks. Discussion Universities are encouraged to strengthen RG policies, expand collaboration, and improve visibility to enhance both research impact and alignment with their broader missions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1719073
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of research group visibility, governance, and engagement in the top 500 global universities

Faleh Sawair, Nathir M. Obeidat, Hadeel Ghazzawi
Frontiers in Education
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Evaluation of research group visibility, governance, and engagement in the top 500 global universities

Faleh Sawair, Nathir M. Obeidat, Hadeel Ghazzawi
article en

Abstract

Introduction This exploratory quantitative study examines how the visibility of Research Groups (RGs) is structured, supported, and applied across the QS Top 500 universities (2026), reflecting a global shift toward research groups that serve society rather than solely academic prestige. Methods The analysis investigates the presence of formal governance frameworks, dedicated resources, visibility, interdisciplinary and international collaboration, student involvement, and external engagement with industry, government, and communities. It also compares patterns across global regions and between top-200 and 201–500 ranked universities. Results Findings revealed that while most universities host RGs with defined leaders, themes, and student participation, fewer than 40% employ formal policies or centralized oversight. Less than half of RGs build active partnerships beyond academia, secure external funding, or systematically share their achievements publicly. Mid-ranked universities display higher RG visibility and structured integration than many elite universities, which often rely on legacy laboratories and reputation rather than formal group frameworks. Discussion Universities are encouraged to strengthen RG policies, expand collaboration, and improve visibility to enhance both research impact and alignment with their broader missions.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
University of Jordan (JO)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.