Rule of Law and National Autonomy in the European Union: Who Defines the Boundaries?

This article examines the evolving tension between national autonomy and the European Union’s common concept of the rule of law, with a particular focus on judicial independence. While Article 2 TEU frames the rule of law as a value common to all Member States, recent jurisprudence— especially involving Poland—has exposed significant divergences between national and EU-level interpretations. The independence of the judiciary has become a key issue, raising questions about the autonomy Member States have when changing their justice systems and the limits of EU intervention. The article analyses how the EU defines and enforces the rule of law and whether a genuinely “common” understanding exists. In this context, the Polish case illustrates the legal and institutional difficulties involved in restoring the rule of law, highlighting the complex interplay between EU legal obligations and national constitutional identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im Adama Mickiewicza
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2025.17.04
Primary Topic
Multidisciplinary Warburg-centric Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rule of Law and National Autonomy in the European Union: Who Defines the Boundaries?

Karolína Godál
Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im Adama Mickiewicza
Multidisciplinary Warburg-centric Studies
article

Rule of Law and National Autonomy in the European Union: Who Defines the Boundaries?

Karolína Godál
article en

Abstract

This article examines the evolving tension between national autonomy and the European Union’s common concept of the rule of law, with a particular focus on judicial independence. While Article 2 TEU frames the rule of law as a value common to all Member States, recent jurisprudence— especially involving Poland—has exposed significant divergences between national and EU-level interpretations. The independence of the judiciary has become a key issue, raising questions about the autonomy Member States have when changing their justice systems and the limits of EU intervention. The article analyses how the EU defines and enforces the rule of law and whether a genuinely “common” understanding exists. In this context, the Polish case illustrates the legal and institutional difficulties involved in restoring the rule of law, highlighting the complex interplay between EU legal obligations and national constitutional identity.

Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im Adama MickiewiczaVol. 17
Charles University (CZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Multidisciplinary Warburg-centric Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.