Piercing Liability in the Polish and German Legal Systems

Piercing liability is one of the most important and interesting issues in company law. It refers to a process of “breaking” or even “piercing” the legal separateness of several related companies in order to provide legal protection for the interests of creditors of one of them. This issue is linked to the improper, and consequently undesirable, exploitation of the distinctiveness of a subsidiary company by the parent that controls it. In a nutshell, piercing liability is seen as a legal instrument whose purpose is to give protection to creditors, even if this involves disregarding the legal personality of a particular company or even rejecting the legal and organisational personality of the entity. It is a response to the abuses of those who misuse legal personality, but also a response to the needs of the modern economy. At the same time, it raises serious doubts and even controversies in every legal system in which it is applied. This is due to the fact that clear criteria for the application of piercing liability have not been formulated in any of the legal systems mentioned. In the article, I will characterise the reasons for the introduction and development of piercing liability in the Republic of Poland and in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im Adama Mickiewicza
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2025.17.08
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Piercing Liability in the Polish and German Legal Systems

Klaudia Modrzejewska
Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im Adama Mickiewicza
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

Piercing Liability in the Polish and German Legal Systems

Klaudia Modrzejewska
article en

Abstract

Piercing liability is one of the most important and interesting issues in company law. It refers to a process of “breaking” or even “piercing” the legal separateness of several related companies in order to provide legal protection for the interests of creditors of one of them. This issue is linked to the improper, and consequently undesirable, exploitation of the distinctiveness of a subsidiary company by the parent that controls it. In a nutshell, piercing liability is seen as a legal instrument whose purpose is to give protection to creditors, even if this involves disregarding the legal personality of a particular company or even rejecting the legal and organisational personality of the entity. It is a response to the abuses of those who misuse legal personality, but also a response to the needs of the modern economy. At the same time, it raises serious doubts and even controversies in every legal system in which it is applied. This is due to the fact that clear criteria for the application of piercing liability have not been formulated in any of the legal systems mentioned. In the article, I will characterise the reasons for the introduction and development of piercing liability in the Republic of Poland and in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im Adama MickiewiczaVol. 17
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.