Assessing the epistemic dimension of people–place relationships for inclusive ecosystem governance

Abstract Senses of place scholarship have rarely addressed the epistemic dimension that influences how people perceive, interpret and interact with places through their knowledges. This limits our understanding of subjective stances and possible contestations within ecosystem governance. We develop the concept of epistemic bonding and conceptualise it as the subjective connection to a place that is created through (perceived) knowledge and the process of knowing about a place. We explore its relationship to the established five dimensions of place attachment by using survey data from 306 residents of the High Coast/Kvarken Archipelago UNESCO Natural World Heritage Site in Sweden and Finland. We also assess the relationship between epistemic bonding and views on management practices in each country. The results show that epistemic bonding is strongly correlated with place dependence and identity and is consistently associated with long‐term residency and having family history in the area. Higher epistemic bonding indicated a more negative stance towards official nature protection in Finland. By foregrounding epistemic bonding, we emphasise the role of knowledge in forming place bonds. Epistemic bonding can be a useful lens for understanding how individuals respond to environmental decision‐making. Focusing on epistemic bonds highlights crucial questions about whose knowledge is recognised and shapes the management of places, as well as how diverse ways of knowing and relating to place influence the perceived inclusivity of ecosystem governance. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70228
Primary Topic
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the epistemic dimension of people–place relationships for inclusive ecosystem governance

Christopher M. Raymond, Viola Hakkarainen, Katriina Soini
People and Nature
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
article

Assessing the epistemic dimension of people–place relationships for inclusive ecosystem governance

Christopher M. Raymond, Viola Hakkarainen, Katriina Soini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Senses of place scholarship have rarely addressed the epistemic dimension that influences how people perceive, interpret and interact with places through their knowledges. This limits our understanding of subjective stances and possible contestations within ecosystem governance. We develop the concept of epistemic bonding and conceptualise it as the subjective connection to a place that is created through (perceived) knowledge and the process of knowing about a place. We explore its relationship to the established five dimensions of place attachment by using survey data from 306 residents of the High Coast/Kvarken Archipelago UNESCO Natural World Heritage Site in Sweden and Finland. We also assess the relationship between epistemic bonding and views on management practices in each country. The results show that epistemic bonding is strongly correlated with place dependence and identity and is consistently associated with long‐term residency and having family history in the area. Higher epistemic bonding indicated a more negative stance towards official nature protection in Finland. By foregrounding epistemic bonding, we emphasise the role of knowledge in forming place bonds. Epistemic bonding can be a useful lens for understanding how individuals respond to environmental decision‐making. Focusing on epistemic bonds highlights crucial questions about whose knowledge is recognised and shapes the management of places, as well as how diverse ways of knowing and relating to place influence the perceived inclusivity of ecosystem governance. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 8(2)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), University of Helsinki (FI), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (FI)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.