The role of defenders' and victims' popularity in the effectiveness of defending in bullying interactions: A longitudinal social network study

Peer defending is widely promoted as a strategy to reduce bullying, but few studies have investigated whether having more defenders decreases victimization over time from the victim's perspective. This social network study examined the longitudinal association between nominating more defenders and subsequent victimization among (early) adolescents and tested whether this relation is moderated by the popularity status of the defender and the victim. The sample included 1450 participants from 93 secondary school classes (grades 4-9) in Finland (52.51% female; M<sub>age</sub> = 12.38 years, SD<sub>age</sub> = 1.56). Results from longitudinal social network analyses showed that contrary to expectations, having more defenders did not reduce victimization over time. Moreover, the popularity of the defender or the victim did not moderate this effect. Results did not differ by grade. These findings suggest that defending alone may not protect students from ongoing victimization and highlight the need for broader, multi-level intervention strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.70126
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of defenders' and victims' popularity in the effectiveness of defending in bullying interactions: A longitudinal social network study

Rene Veenstra, Lydia Laninga‐Wijnen, Stefanie Richters, Maarten H. W. van Zalk
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

The role of defenders' and victims' popularity in the effectiveness of defending in bullying interactions: A longitudinal social network study

Rene Veenstra, Lydia Laninga‐Wijnen, Stefanie Richters, Maarten H. W. van Zalk
article en

Abstract

Peer defending is widely promoted as a strategy to reduce bullying, but few studies have investigated whether having more defenders decreases victimization over time from the victim's perspective. This social network study examined the longitudinal association between nominating more defenders and subsequent victimization among (early) adolescents and tested whether this relation is moderated by the popularity status of the defender and the victim. The sample included 1450 participants from 93 secondary school classes (grades 4-9) in Finland (52.51% female; M<sub>age</sub> = 12.38 years, SD<sub>age</sub> = 1.56). Results from longitudinal social network analyses showed that contrary to expectations, having more defenders did not reduce victimization over time. Moreover, the popularity of the defender or the victim did not moderate this effect. Results did not differ by grade. These findings suggest that defending alone may not protect students from ongoing victimization and highlight the need for broader, multi-level intervention strategies.

Journal of Research on AdolescenceVol. 36(1)
University of Turku (FI), University of Groningen (NL), Osnabrück University (DE), Hochschule Osnabrück (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.