Generative AI in Art Education: A Systematic Review of Research Trends, Tool Applications, and Outcomes (2019–2025)

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools are transforming art education by enabling instant creation of textual, visual, audio, and multimodal outputs. This systematic review synthesizes research on GenAI applications in art education from January 2019 to August 2025. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 19 peer-reviewed empirical studies across six databases (Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Scopus, and ERIC) met inclusion criteria, which required clear pedagogical implementation with students or educators as active participants. Research accelerated from two studies in 2023 to 14 in 2025, with most studies examining higher education and East Asia contexts through mixed methods approaches and grounded in constructivist and cognitive learning theories. Text-to-image generation models (DALL-E, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion) and conversational AI (ChatGPT) were most frequently implemented across creative production, pedagogical scaffolding, and instructional design applications. Findings from this emerging body of research suggest that GenAI has the potential to improve learning achievement, creative thinking, engagement, and cultural understanding when integrated through structured pedagogical frameworks with intentional instructor design. However, these positive outcomes represent early-stage implementation trends in well-resourced contexts rather than broadly generalizable conclusions. Successful integration requires explicit instructional frameworks, clear ethical guidelines for human-AI collaboration, and evolved assessment methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010047
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI in Art Education: A Systematic Review of Research Trends, Tool Applications, and Outcomes (2019–2025)

Zifeng Liu, Yihan Jiang, Fan Ying
1 citations
Education Sciences
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
1.43
article

Generative AI in Art Education: A Systematic Review of Research Trends, Tool Applications, and Outcomes (2019–2025)

Zifeng Liu, Yihan Jiang, Fan Ying
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools are transforming art education by enabling instant creation of textual, visual, audio, and multimodal outputs. This systematic review synthesizes research on GenAI applications in art education from January 2019 to August 2025. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 19 peer-reviewed empirical studies across six databases (Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Scopus, and ERIC) met inclusion criteria, which required clear pedagogical implementation with students or educators as active participants. Research accelerated from two studies in 2023 to 14 in 2025, with most studies examining higher education and East Asia contexts through mixed methods approaches and grounded in constructivist and cognitive learning theories. Text-to-image generation models (DALL-E, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion) and conversational AI (ChatGPT) were most frequently implemented across creative production, pedagogical scaffolding, and instructional design applications. Findings from this emerging body of research suggest that GenAI has the potential to improve learning achievement, creative thinking, engagement, and cultural understanding when integrated through structured pedagogical frameworks with intentional instructor design. However, these positive outcomes represent early-stage implementation trends in well-resourced contexts rather than broadly generalizable conclusions. Successful integration requires explicit instructional frameworks, clear ethical guidelines for human-AI collaboration, and evolved assessment methods.

Education SciencesVol. 16(1)
University of Florida (US), Florida College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.