CARA: Constrained Artificial Reasoning Architecture

This paper introduces CARA (Constrained Artificial Reasoning Architecture), a protocol-level governance framework for reasoning systems, including AI systems, that treats epistemic authority as an explicitly managed state rather than an emergent property of model behavior. CARA identifies a class of failures termed ‘authority laundering,’ where claims or artifacts silently gain legitimacy without any auditable authority‑granting event, and proposes a small set of primitives—trace‑first execution, phase discipline, explicit admission events, producer–admitter separation, and fail‑closed transitions—to prevent unauthorized epistemic state changes. The paper specifies minimal entities and invariants, along with diagnostic canaries that distinguish governed from ungoverned systems, while intentionally omitting implementation details so the focus remains on information discipline rather than a particular deployment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18092899
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CARA: Constrained Artificial Reasoning Architecture

Adam Ableman Mazurk
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
article

CARA: Constrained Artificial Reasoning Architecture

Adam Ableman Mazurk
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces CARA (Constrained Artificial Reasoning Architecture), a protocol-level governance framework for reasoning systems, including AI systems, that treats epistemic authority as an explicitly managed state rather than an emergent property of model behavior. CARA identifies a class of failures termed ‘authority laundering,’ where claims or artifacts silently gain legitimacy without any auditable authority‑granting event, and proposes a small set of primitives—trace‑first execution, phase discipline, explicit admission events, producer–admitter separation, and fail‑closed transitions—to prevent unauthorized epistemic state changes. The paper specifies minimal entities and invariants, along with diagnostic canaries that distinguish governed from ungoverned systems, while intentionally omitting implementation details so the focus remains on information discipline rather than a particular deployment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.