Differential Effect of M1 and Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Balance Performance in Stroke

Both the primary motor cortex (M1) and the cerebellum can be viable targets for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to improve balance after stroke; however, the optimal stimulation target is unknown. The study objective was to compare the role of two neural loci (M1 and cerebellum) in modulating balance performance in individuals with chronic stroke using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Nineteen individuals with chronic stroke (mean age = 57.2 ± 11.1 years, 13 males) received a single session of 5-Hz rTMS applied to bilateral M1 and the contralesional cerebellum in a crossover randomized manner with a washout period of 7 ± 2 days. Anticipatory and reactive balance was assessed before and after rTMS using the Limits of Stability (LOS) test and modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB), respectively. M1 rTMS significantly improved LOS sway angle compared to cerebellar rTMS (p < 0.001). The rTMS effect on the mCTSIB sway index was mediated by stimulation target, surface, vision, and time (p = 0.006). Sway index measured under the eyes-open conditions was not influenced by rTMS. Under eyes-closed conditions, M1 rTMS significantly improved sway index on the firm surface (p = 0.002), whereas cerebellar rTMS improved sway index on the foam surface (p = 0.001). M1 and cerebellum are viable rTMS targets for improving balance. M1 stimulation enhances anticipatory balance, whereas cerebellar rTMS improves reactive balance, especially under sensory-deprived conditions. This study provides critical information for future tailored NIBS intervention in individuals with stroke.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70363
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential Effect of M1 and Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Balance Performance in Stroke

H. G. Goh, Jodi Thomas, Ann Medley, Vyoma Parikh
European Journal of Neuroscience
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Differential Effect of M1 and Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Balance Performance in Stroke

H. G. Goh, Jodi Thomas, Ann Medley, Vyoma Parikh
article en

Abstract

Both the primary motor cortex (M1) and the cerebellum can be viable targets for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to improve balance after stroke; however, the optimal stimulation target is unknown. The study objective was to compare the role of two neural loci (M1 and cerebellum) in modulating balance performance in individuals with chronic stroke using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Nineteen individuals with chronic stroke (mean age = 57.2 ± 11.1 years, 13 males) received a single session of 5-Hz rTMS applied to bilateral M1 and the contralesional cerebellum in a crossover randomized manner with a washout period of 7 ± 2 days. Anticipatory and reactive balance was assessed before and after rTMS using the Limits of Stability (LOS) test and modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB), respectively. M1 rTMS significantly improved LOS sway angle compared to cerebellar rTMS (p < 0.001). The rTMS effect on the mCTSIB sway index was mediated by stimulation target, surface, vision, and time (p = 0.006). Sway index measured under the eyes-open conditions was not influenced by rTMS. Under eyes-closed conditions, M1 rTMS significantly improved sway index on the firm surface (p = 0.002), whereas cerebellar rTMS improved sway index on the foam surface (p = 0.001). M1 and cerebellum are viable rTMS targets for improving balance. M1 stimulation enhances anticipatory balance, whereas cerebellar rTMS improves reactive balance, especially under sensory-deprived conditions. This study provides critical information for future tailored NIBS intervention in individuals with stroke.

European Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 63(1)
Emory University (US), Texas Woman's University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.