Capturing the Uncertainty of Seismicity Observations in Earthquake Rate Estimates: Implications for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and the USGS National Seismic Hazard Model

ABSTRACT The rate of earthquakes in a region is a fundamental input to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis. We present a Monte Carlo method for computing that rate from seismicity catalogs while including a range of data and analysis uncertainties. This method is applied to regions for which the b value is assumed to be spatially invariant. Each region is broken down into epochs for which each epoch is estimated to have a uniform magnitude of completeness (Mc). The distribution of earthquake rates for M≥Mc is determined for each epoch by considering the Poisson likelihood of rates given the number of observed earthquakes with M≥Mc. We use a Monte Carlo process to include the uncertainty in b, Mc, and individual event magnitudes. The result for each epoch is the joint distribution of the Poisson rate of earthquakes with magnitudes larger than the minimum value used to calculate hazard (M1) and the Gutenberg–Richter b values, which control the extrapolation to other magnitudes. The rate for each region is either the duration-weighted average over the epochs or, to better capture temporal variations, we also consider mixture models. The mixture models also provide an avenue to allow temporal variations in b values. To implement this joint distribution in a logic tree, we use the mean and 95% confidence branches, each of which is parameterized with an M≥M1 rate and b value. We explore different ways of defining those branches, as well as non-Gutenberg–Richter branches, and their impact on hazard estimates. The mean hazard, but not the fractiles, is robust with respect to these choices. To illustrate these new methods, we use synthetic data and catalogs from recent U.S. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard Models for the Central and Eastern United States and for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120240245
Citations
3
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capturing the Uncertainty of Seismicity Observations in Earthquake Rate Estimates: Implications for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and the USGS National Seismic Hazard Model

A. L. Llenos, Andrew J. Michael
3 citations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
earthquake and tectonic studies
5.60
article

Capturing the Uncertainty of Seismicity Observations in Earthquake Rate Estimates: Implications for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and the USGS National Seismic Hazard Model

A. L. Llenos, Andrew J. Michael
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The rate of earthquakes in a region is a fundamental input to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis. We present a Monte Carlo method for computing that rate from seismicity catalogs while including a range of data and analysis uncertainties. This method is applied to regions for which the b value is assumed to be spatially invariant. Each region is broken down into epochs for which each epoch is estimated to have a uniform magnitude of completeness (Mc). The distribution of earthquake rates for M≥Mc is determined for each epoch by considering the Poisson likelihood of rates given the number of observed earthquakes with M≥Mc. We use a Monte Carlo process to include the uncertainty in b, Mc, and individual event magnitudes. The result for each epoch is the joint distribution of the Poisson rate of earthquakes with magnitudes larger than the minimum value used to calculate hazard (M1) and the Gutenberg–Richter b values, which control the extrapolation to other magnitudes. The rate for each region is either the duration-weighted average over the epochs or, to better capture temporal variations, we also consider mixture models. The mixture models also provide an avenue to allow temporal variations in b values. To implement this joint distribution in a logic tree, we use the mean and 95% confidence branches, each of which is parameterized with an M≥M1 rate and b value. We explore different ways of defining those branches, as well as non-Gutenberg–Richter branches, and their impact on hazard estimates. The mean hazard, but not the fractiles, is robust with respect to these choices. To illustrate these new methods, we use synthetic data and catalogs from recent U.S. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard Models for the Central and Eastern United States and for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaVol. 116(2)
United States Geological Survey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
earthquake and tectonic studies
5.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.