Evaluating the operational effectiveness of Emergency Medical Team field hospitals: A novel tool for measuring surge capacity performance

As the frequency and complexity of disasters increase, Emergency Medical Teams (EMTs) and their field hospitals have become essential to delivering medical care in crisis settings. Despite their critical role, no validated tool currently exists to evaluate EMT field hospital performance in real time. To develop, validate, and pilot a real-time evaluation tool to assess the operational effectiveness of EMT field hospitals. A mixed-methods approach was used to construct the tool. Initial Key Performance Indicator (KPI) domains were derived from an extensive literature review and refined through 20 expert interviews and a modified Delphi process. KPI domains meeting a ≥75% consensus threshold were included. The finalized tool, composed of six KPI domains, was developed into a digital application with real-time dashboard functionality. The tool was piloted in a full-scale simulation of a Type 1 mobile EMT deployment responding to a simulated outbreak. Seventeen EMT personnel participated. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-sample t-tests, and Pearson correlations. Qualitative feedback was also collected. Six validated KPI domains formed the tool’s core: Deployment & Operational Readiness, Clinical Service Delivery, Needs & Capacity Assessment, Staffing & Human Resources, Equipment & Logistics, and Coordination & Communication. The pilot yielded a high overall performance score (4.52/5), with the highest ratings in deployment readiness and clinical services. The lowest score was identified in coordination and communication. Perceived elements (e.g., safety, teamwork, wellbeing) correlated strongly with perceived effectiveness but showed a statistically significant gap when compared to objective performance scores (p < 0.05). Qualitative feedback highlighted the tool's utility but raised concerns over data collection burden during real-time deployment. The tool provides a structured yet flexible framework for monitoring EMT field hospital performance. While promising, future field validation and streamlining are needed to balance comprehensiveness with operational feasibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105987
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the operational effectiveness of Emergency Medical Team field hospitals: A novel tool for measuring surge capacity performance

Bruria Adini, Arielle Kaim, Moran Bodas
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Disaster Response and Management
article

Evaluating the operational effectiveness of Emergency Medical Team field hospitals: A novel tool for measuring surge capacity performance

Bruria Adini, Arielle Kaim, Moran Bodas
article en

Abstract

As the frequency and complexity of disasters increase, Emergency Medical Teams (EMTs) and their field hospitals have become essential to delivering medical care in crisis settings. Despite their critical role, no validated tool currently exists to evaluate EMT field hospital performance in real time. To develop, validate, and pilot a real-time evaluation tool to assess the operational effectiveness of EMT field hospitals. A mixed-methods approach was used to construct the tool. Initial Key Performance Indicator (KPI) domains were derived from an extensive literature review and refined through 20 expert interviews and a modified Delphi process. KPI domains meeting a ≥75% consensus threshold were included. The finalized tool, composed of six KPI domains, was developed into a digital application with real-time dashboard functionality. The tool was piloted in a full-scale simulation of a Type 1 mobile EMT deployment responding to a simulated outbreak. Seventeen EMT personnel participated. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-sample t-tests, and Pearson correlations. Qualitative feedback was also collected. Six validated KPI domains formed the tool’s core: Deployment & Operational Readiness, Clinical Service Delivery, Needs & Capacity Assessment, Staffing & Human Resources, Equipment & Logistics, and Coordination & Communication. The pilot yielded a high overall performance score (4.52/5), with the highest ratings in deployment readiness and clinical services. The lowest score was identified in coordination and communication. Perceived elements (e.g., safety, teamwork, wellbeing) correlated strongly with perceived effectiveness but showed a statistically significant gap when compared to objective performance scores (p < 0.05). Qualitative feedback highlighted the tool's utility but raised concerns over data collection burden during real-time deployment. The tool provides a structured yet flexible framework for monitoring EMT field hospital performance. While promising, future field validation and streamlining are needed to balance comprehensiveness with operational feasibility.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 132
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.