Integrating Mixed Reality Navigation in Spine Surgery: Experience from a National Spinal Injuries Unit and Logistical-Economic Analysis

Introduction Mixed Reality (MR) navigation overlays three-dimensional anatomical reconstructions into the surgeon’s operative field. This study presents a case series describing the clinical application, workflow integration, and logisticaleconomic considerations of the Brainlab Spine MR Navigation System in spinal surgery. Methods A retrospective review was performed using data from all spinal procedures completed with the Brainlab MR navigation platform between September 2024 and March 2025. Fifteen patients underwent posterior procedures, including trauma, degenerative, oncologic, and deformity cases. Operative approach, levels fused, use of minimally invasive techniques, setup time, and intraoperative workflow integration were documented. Postoperative imaging was reviewed for hardware placement and alignment. Results MR was implemented in six trauma, five degenerative, three oncologic, and one deformity case. Four procedures (27%) used percutaneous techniques. The mean number of levels fused was 2.9 (range 1–8). The MR system added approximately 3–5 minutes for registration, with headset re-registration required in three cases, resolved without significant delay. No intraoperative complications were attributable to MR use. Postoperative imaging confirmed correct hardware positioning and satisfactory alignment in all patients. Surgeons reported benefit in percutaneous stabilisations and tumour resections from continuous 3D overlays. The 3-year cost for a dual-headset system was €59,660 with no ongoing per-case consumable costs. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of MR navigation in posterior spinal procedures. The system integrates efficiently into existing workflows, enhances spatial awareness, and may offer particular value in minimally invasive and tumour cases. Further prospective studies are required to assess outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and broader adoption potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Premier journal of science.
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70389/pjs.100193
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Mixed Reality Navigation in Spine Surgery: Experience from a National Spinal Injuries Unit and Logistical-Economic Analysis

Jake McDonnell, Kevin Clesham, Seamus Morris, Sam Lynch et al.
Premier journal of science.
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Integrating Mixed Reality Navigation in Spine Surgery: Experience from a National Spinal Injuries Unit and Logistical-Economic Analysis

Jake McDonnell, Kevin Clesham, Seamus Morris, Sam Lynch, Stacey L. Darwish, Katherine Egan, Joseph Simon Butler, Keith Synnott, Arnav Barve, Horea Pop, Marcus Timlin, Dave Moore
article en

Abstract

Introduction Mixed Reality (MR) navigation overlays three-dimensional anatomical reconstructions into the surgeon’s operative field. This study presents a case series describing the clinical application, workflow integration, and logisticaleconomic considerations of the Brainlab Spine MR Navigation System in spinal surgery. Methods A retrospective review was performed using data from all spinal procedures completed with the Brainlab MR navigation platform between September 2024 and March 2025. Fifteen patients underwent posterior procedures, including trauma, degenerative, oncologic, and deformity cases. Operative approach, levels fused, use of minimally invasive techniques, setup time, and intraoperative workflow integration were documented. Postoperative imaging was reviewed for hardware placement and alignment. Results MR was implemented in six trauma, five degenerative, three oncologic, and one deformity case. Four procedures (27%) used percutaneous techniques. The mean number of levels fused was 2.9 (range 1–8). The MR system added approximately 3–5 minutes for registration, with headset re-registration required in three cases, resolved without significant delay. No intraoperative complications were attributable to MR use. Postoperative imaging confirmed correct hardware positioning and satisfactory alignment in all patients. Surgeons reported benefit in percutaneous stabilisations and tumour resections from continuous 3D overlays. The 3-year cost for a dual-headset system was €59,660 with no ongoing per-case consumable costs. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of MR navigation in posterior spinal procedures. The system integrates efficiently into existing workflows, enhances spatial awareness, and may offer particular value in minimally invasive and tumour cases. Further prospective studies are required to assess outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and broader adoption potential.

Premier journal of science.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.