A Generalization Error Bound of Physics‐Informed Neural Networks for Ecological Diffusion Models

ABSTRACT Ecological diffusion equations (EDEs) are partial differential equations (PDEs) that model spatiotemporal dynamics, often applied to wildlife diseases. Derived from ecological mechanisms, EDEs are useful for forecasting, inference, and decision‐making, such as guiding surveillance strategies for wildlife diseases. Physics‐informed neural networks (PINNs) offer a cutting‐edge approach to approximating the solution of EDEs by constraining the loss function. PINNs have shown empirical success in forecasting and inference in wildlife disease problems. However, theoretical properties of PINNs in this context remain unexplored. In this paper, we derive a generalization error bound for PINNs applied to forward problems in EDEs, providing new crucial theoretical results for statistical analysis. Furthermore, we compare the performance of PINNs with commonly used numerical solvers, showing that PINNs achieve competitive accuracy while providing important modelling flexibility. Our results help connecting theory and application in EDE‐based statistical models for ecological systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stat
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.70104
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Generalization Error Bound of Physics‐Informed Neural Networks for Ecological Diffusion Models

Ian P. McGahan, Juan Francisco Mandujano Reyes, Jun Zhu, Daniel Walsh
Stat
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

A Generalization Error Bound of Physics‐Informed Neural Networks for Ecological Diffusion Models

Ian P. McGahan, Juan Francisco Mandujano Reyes, Jun Zhu, Daniel Walsh
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ecological diffusion equations (EDEs) are partial differential equations (PDEs) that model spatiotemporal dynamics, often applied to wildlife diseases. Derived from ecological mechanisms, EDEs are useful for forecasting, inference, and decision‐making, such as guiding surveillance strategies for wildlife diseases. Physics‐informed neural networks (PINNs) offer a cutting‐edge approach to approximating the solution of EDEs by constraining the loss function. PINNs have shown empirical success in forecasting and inference in wildlife disease problems. However, theoretical properties of PINNs in this context remain unexplored. In this paper, we derive a generalization error bound for PINNs applied to forward problems in EDEs, providing new crucial theoretical results for statistical analysis. Furthermore, we compare the performance of PINNs with commonly used numerical solvers, showing that PINNs achieve competitive accuracy while providing important modelling flexibility. Our results help connecting theory and application in EDE‐based statistical models for ecological systems.

StatVol. 15(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of South Carolina (US), Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Geological Survey, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.