Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient Privacy Scale

Background — Protecting patient privacy is a key principle in relationships between healthcare professionals. A validated and reliable instrument for assessing patient privacy during surgical procedures in the operating room (OR) is lacking. Objective — The goal of this study is to develop a psychometric instrument for assessing patient privacy protection from the perspective of OR staff. Methods — This is a methodological study. Initially, items were developed based on qualitative research, a comprehensive literature review, and input from experts in the field of gerontology and questionnaire development. The validity and reliability of the developed instrument were then assessed using face validity, content validity, construct validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and reliability based on Cronbach’s alpha, and internal consistency coefficient. Results — A total of 27 items were generated. During development, 9 items were excluded, resulting in a preliminary version of the questionnaire containing 18 items that underwent psychometric evaluation. The content validity index (CVI) value for most items was above 0.9, and the content validity ratio (CVR) was above 0.79. Finally, the instrument, which included 18 items across four dimensions (physical, informational, psychological, and environmental), was examined using EFA. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for this instrument was 0.91. Conclusion — The developed Patient Privacy Questionnaire for Operating Room Staff has acceptable validity and reliability. This instrument can be used as a simple, convenient, valid, and reliable tool for assessing patient privacy protection from the perspective of OR staff.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Open Medical Journal
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15275/rusomj.2025.0417
Primary Topic
Patient Dignity and Privacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient Privacy Scale

Mohammad Masoud Vakili, Arezoo Malekmohammadi, Alireza Razzaghi
Russian Open Medical Journal
Patient Dignity and Privacy
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient Privacy Scale

Mohammad Masoud Vakili, Arezoo Malekmohammadi, Alireza Razzaghi
article en

Abstract

Background — Protecting patient privacy is a key principle in relationships between healthcare professionals. A validated and reliable instrument for assessing patient privacy during surgical procedures in the operating room (OR) is lacking. Objective — The goal of this study is to develop a psychometric instrument for assessing patient privacy protection from the perspective of OR staff. Methods — This is a methodological study. Initially, items were developed based on qualitative research, a comprehensive literature review, and input from experts in the field of gerontology and questionnaire development. The validity and reliability of the developed instrument were then assessed using face validity, content validity, construct validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and reliability based on Cronbach’s alpha, and internal consistency coefficient. Results — A total of 27 items were generated. During development, 9 items were excluded, resulting in a preliminary version of the questionnaire containing 18 items that underwent psychometric evaluation. The content validity index (CVI) value for most items was above 0.9, and the content validity ratio (CVR) was above 0.79. Finally, the instrument, which included 18 items across four dimensions (physical, informational, psychological, and environmental), was examined using EFA. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for this instrument was 0.91. Conclusion — The developed Patient Privacy Questionnaire for Operating Room Staff has acceptable validity and reliability. This instrument can be used as a simple, convenient, valid, and reliable tool for assessing patient privacy protection from the perspective of OR staff.

Russian Open Medical JournalVol. 14(4)
Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Patient Dignity and Privacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.