Not So Soft Side of Femininity: Interpretating the Validity of Inclusive Femininity

Abstract The concept of “inclusive femininity” has recently garnered significant attention both in academic circles and the media. It proposes replacing the traditional notion of femininity as passive and submissive with a more inclusive framework for understanding gender dynamics in societies that exhibit reduced levels of cultural misogyny and “femmephobia.” This shift holds profound implications for critical studies on women and femininities. The article is structured into two parts, commencing with a theoretical examination of the application of inclusive femininity and its purported advantages over traditional conceptions of femininity. The latter section delves into an analysis of the conceptual distinctions between misogyny and femmephobia within the framework of inclusive femininity. This analysis reveals several significant theoretical concerns that cast doubt upon the reliability of research employing the concept of inclusive femininity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaf060
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not So Soft Side of Femininity: Interpretating the Validity of Inclusive Femininity

Akarsh Singh, Krishan Gopal
Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

Not So Soft Side of Femininity: Interpretating the Validity of Inclusive Femininity

Akarsh Singh, Krishan Gopal
article en

Abstract

Abstract The concept of “inclusive femininity” has recently garnered significant attention both in academic circles and the media. It proposes replacing the traditional notion of femininity as passive and submissive with a more inclusive framework for understanding gender dynamics in societies that exhibit reduced levels of cultural misogyny and “femmephobia.” This shift holds profound implications for critical studies on women and femininities. The article is structured into two parts, commencing with a theoretical examination of the application of inclusive femininity and its purported advantages over traditional conceptions of femininity. The latter section delves into an analysis of the conceptual distinctions between misogyny and femmephobia within the framework of inclusive femininity. This analysis reveals several significant theoretical concerns that cast doubt upon the reliability of research employing the concept of inclusive femininity.

Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society
Lovely Professional University (IN), Symbiosis International University (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.