Reasoning Claim Tokens (RCTs): A Minimal Evidentiary Primitive for Governing AI-Mediated Representations

As generative AI systems increasingly mediate how enterprises are represented to consumers, regulators, and markets, organizations face a governance gap: consequential AI outputs are produced by systems they do not control and cannot inspect internally. Existing approaches emphasize accuracy, optimization, or interpretability, but none provide a minimal evidentiary layer suitable for post-incident accountability. This document defines Reasoning Claim Tokens (RCTs) as a governance primitive designed to address this gap. RCTs capture discrete, time-indexed reasoning claims expressed by AI models during inference, without intervening in or explaining internal model logic. They provide a model-agnostic, reconstructable record of expressed reasoning sufficient to support audit, legal review, and risk governance. RCTs are positioned as evidentiary artifacts, not optimization tools, and are intended to govern external AI representations where internal model access is unavailable.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18096977
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reasoning Claim Tokens (RCTs): A Minimal Evidentiary Primitive for Governing AI-Mediated Representations

Tim de Rosen
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Reasoning Claim Tokens (RCTs): A Minimal Evidentiary Primitive for Governing AI-Mediated Representations

Tim de Rosen
article en

Abstract

As generative AI systems increasingly mediate how enterprises are represented to consumers, regulators, and markets, organizations face a governance gap: consequential AI outputs are produced by systems they do not control and cannot inspect internally. Existing approaches emphasize accuracy, optimization, or interpretability, but none provide a minimal evidentiary layer suitable for post-incident accountability. This document defines Reasoning Claim Tokens (RCTs) as a governance primitive designed to address this gap. RCTs capture discrete, time-indexed reasoning claims expressed by AI models during inference, without intervening in or explaining internal model logic. They provide a model-agnostic, reconstructable record of expressed reasoning sufficient to support audit, legal review, and risk governance. RCTs are positioned as evidentiary artifacts, not optimization tools, and are intended to govern external AI representations where internal model access is unavailable.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reasoning Claim Tokens (RCTs): A Minimal Evidentiary Primitive for Governing AI-Mediated Representations — Tim de Rosen · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS