Comparative Assessment of Sensory Comfort Properties Across Eco-Friendly Textile Materials for Apparel

This study evaluates the sensory comfort of eco-friendly textiles, comparing natural (bamboo, organic cotton, hemp, jute, soya bean protein fibers), regenerated (Tencel (lyocell)), and synthetic (recycled polyester, recycled nylon) fibers for sustainable apparel applications. Through a comprehensive analysis, we quantify thermal, moisture, and tactile properties, revealing significant performance differences. Bamboo (thermal conductivity 0.049 W/m·K, air permeability 695 mm/s) excels in cooling and breathability, while hemp (0.022 W/m·K, thermal resistance 22.0 × 10−3 m2 ·K/W) offers superior insulation. Recycled polyester (1635 mm/s, moisture regains 0.4%) outperforms natural fibers in breathability but lags in moisture absorption compared to bamboo (13.0%) and Tencel (lyocell) (11.0%). Tencel (lyocell) and soya bean protein fibers provide smooth tactile comfort (friction 0.2–0.3), unlike coarser hemp (0.45). Emerging technologies like electrospinning enhance bamboo’s air permeability by 30% (~900 mm/s), while machine learning optimizes cotton blends for 15–20% better moisture management. Synthetic fibers’ low biodegradability (20–200 years vs. bamboo’s 1–2 years) poses environmental trade-offs. These metrics guide industry decisions, favoring bamboo and Tencel (lyocell) for moisture-absorbing apparel, hemp for insulation, and polyester for activewear, balancing comfort and sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Natural Fibers
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2025.2608721
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Sensory Comfort Properties Across Eco-Friendly Textile Materials for Apparel

Muhammad Qamar Khan, Muhammad Umar, Aima Sameen Anjum, Zarish Choudry et al.
1 citations
Journal of Natural Fibers
Textile materials and evaluations
0.61
article

Comparative Assessment of Sensory Comfort Properties Across Eco-Friendly Textile Materials for Apparel

Muhammad Qamar Khan, Muhammad Umar, Aima Sameen Anjum, Zarish Choudry, Hafiza Hifza Nawaz, Fatima Iftikhar, Adan Zahid
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the sensory comfort of eco-friendly textiles, comparing natural (bamboo, organic cotton, hemp, jute, soya bean protein fibers), regenerated (Tencel (lyocell)), and synthetic (recycled polyester, recycled nylon) fibers for sustainable apparel applications. Through a comprehensive analysis, we quantify thermal, moisture, and tactile properties, revealing significant performance differences. Bamboo (thermal conductivity 0.049 W/m·K, air permeability 695 mm/s) excels in cooling and breathability, while hemp (0.022 W/m·K, thermal resistance 22.0 × 10−3 m2 ·K/W) offers superior insulation. Recycled polyester (1635 mm/s, moisture regains 0.4%) outperforms natural fibers in breathability but lags in moisture absorption compared to bamboo (13.0%) and Tencel (lyocell) (11.0%). Tencel (lyocell) and soya bean protein fibers provide smooth tactile comfort (friction 0.2–0.3), unlike coarser hemp (0.45). Emerging technologies like electrospinning enhance bamboo’s air permeability by 30% (~900 mm/s), while machine learning optimizes cotton blends for 15–20% better moisture management. Synthetic fibers’ low biodegradability (20–200 years vs. bamboo’s 1–2 years) poses environmental trade-offs. These metrics guide industry decisions, favoring bamboo and Tencel (lyocell) for moisture-absorbing apparel, hemp for insulation, and polyester for activewear, balancing comfort and sustainability.

Journal of Natural FibersVol. 23(1)
University of Manchester (GB), National Textile University (PK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Textile materials and evaluations
0.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.