Lifelines and Gateways: The Relational Affordances of Arctic Airports

Airports are indispensable to life in the Arctic. Often shaped by geopolitical agendas and external economic interests, they provide vital links for local communities across remote landscapes. However, their societal roles have received limited scholarly attention. By conducting an ethnographic comparison of three cases, this study examines the relational affordances of Arctic airports. Our case studies include Longyearbyen, which is extremely remote but well connected through its airport; Rovaniemi, a central Arctic hub with an international airport and a range of other transport infrastructure; and Tasiilaq, a region that currently does not (yet) have a well-working air connection. While the first towns are established Arctic tourism destinations, the last aspires to increase accessibility and thus tourist visits by establishing a more central airport. The study applies a relational framework that foregrounds the complex socio-material interactions through which infrastructures acquire meaning and function. Our study reveals how Arctic airports simultaneously afford mobility and essential services for residents, enable economic activities such as tourism, and serve broader state and strategic interests. The comparison enables us to capture not only the salient similarities but also the striking differences between Arctic airports according to their local socio-material and environmental contexts, the availability of alternative transport infrastructure, and broader political processes. By centering airports' relational affordances, this article advances anthropological understandings of Arctic infrastructures and calls for greater local participation in shaping future infrastructural development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416251398478
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lifelines and Gateways: The Relational Affordances of Arctic Airports

Sophie Elixhauser, R. N. Adams, Axel Meyer
1 citations
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
4.20
article

Lifelines and Gateways: The Relational Affordances of Arctic Airports

Sophie Elixhauser, R. N. Adams, Axel Meyer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Airports are indispensable to life in the Arctic. Often shaped by geopolitical agendas and external economic interests, they provide vital links for local communities across remote landscapes. However, their societal roles have received limited scholarly attention. By conducting an ethnographic comparison of three cases, this study examines the relational affordances of Arctic airports. Our case studies include Longyearbyen, which is extremely remote but well connected through its airport; Rovaniemi, a central Arctic hub with an international airport and a range of other transport infrastructure; and Tasiilaq, a region that currently does not (yet) have a well-working air connection. While the first towns are established Arctic tourism destinations, the last aspires to increase accessibility and thus tourist visits by establishing a more central airport. The study applies a relational framework that foregrounds the complex socio-material interactions through which infrastructures acquire meaning and function. Our study reveals how Arctic airports simultaneously afford mobility and essential services for residents, enable economic activities such as tourism, and serve broader state and strategic interests. The comparison enables us to capture not only the salient similarities but also the striking differences between Arctic airports according to their local socio-material and environmental contexts, the availability of alternative transport infrastructure, and broader political processes. By centering airports' relational affordances, this article advances anthropological understandings of Arctic infrastructures and calls for greater local participation in shaping future infrastructural development.

Journal of Contemporary EthnographyVol. 55(1)
University of Vienna (AT), Vestlandsforsking (NO), Institute for Social Anthropology (AT), University of Lapland (FI)
European Commission, Universität Wien
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.