A multimodal critical discourse analysis of unspeakable: the Tulsa Race Massacre

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the use of multimodal critical discourse analysis (MCDA) to answer the question: How do written text and illustrations work together to communicate ideologies about Black people in picture books? Design/methodology/approach Using a flexible method such as multimodal critical discourse analysis, to examine the Coretta Scott King Award-winning text, “Unspeakable: The Tulsa Race Massacre,” allowed researchers to implement the steps of an elementary school read-aloud to engage in the discourse. This study aims to demonstrate that MCDA is a practical method for teachers to use when critically examining children’s literature. Findings Three major themes were found in the analysis: financial wealth, Black citizens unworthy of citizenship and the institutions’ role in violence. Through the use of MCDA, teachers can critically examine children’s texts to encourage critical discussion in the classroom and identify needs for supplemental reading materials. Practical implications MCDA is often criticized for its lack of strict implementation methods; however, this flexibility provides room for methods that are familiar to K-5 classroom teachers. MCDA’s lack of strict implementation methods is a strength of the methodology, which supports its application across various fields. This research illuminates the need for more critical analyses of multicultural literature. Originality/value This study offers a practical approach for teachers to evaluate their classroom reading materials, aiming to bridge the gap between research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
English Teaching Practice & Critique
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-04-2025-0084
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multimodal critical discourse analysis of unspeakable: the Tulsa Race Massacre

Vivica Joines
English Teaching Practice & Critique
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

A multimodal critical discourse analysis of unspeakable: the Tulsa Race Massacre

Vivica Joines
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the use of multimodal critical discourse analysis (MCDA) to answer the question: How do written text and illustrations work together to communicate ideologies about Black people in picture books? Design/methodology/approach Using a flexible method such as multimodal critical discourse analysis, to examine the Coretta Scott King Award-winning text, “Unspeakable: The Tulsa Race Massacre,” allowed researchers to implement the steps of an elementary school read-aloud to engage in the discourse. This study aims to demonstrate that MCDA is a practical method for teachers to use when critically examining children’s literature. Findings Three major themes were found in the analysis: financial wealth, Black citizens unworthy of citizenship and the institutions’ role in violence. Through the use of MCDA, teachers can critically examine children’s texts to encourage critical discussion in the classroom and identify needs for supplemental reading materials. Practical implications MCDA is often criticized for its lack of strict implementation methods; however, this flexibility provides room for methods that are familiar to K-5 classroom teachers. MCDA’s lack of strict implementation methods is a strength of the methodology, which supports its application across various fields. This research illuminates the need for more critical analyses of multicultural literature. Originality/value This study offers a practical approach for teachers to evaluate their classroom reading materials, aiming to bridge the gap between research and practice.

English Teaching Practice & Critique
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.