Variability, Drivers, and Utility of Genetic Diversity‐Area Relationships in Terrestrial Vertebrates

Maintaining genetic diversity within and among populations is critical for conservation and a prominent goal of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. However, direct estimates of genetic diversity are unavailable for most species, and time and resources are insufficient to fill these substantial data gaps and meet conservation target timelines. We evaluated a proxy-based prediction of genetic diversity loss, the Genetic Diversity Area Relationship (GDAR), which describes relationships between genetic diversity and the geographic area occupied by a species. We estimated differences in three metrics of genetic diversity relative to sample area using 55 previously published datasets from 51 species. GDARs were highly variable across species and strongly dependent on population structure, with no clear differences across vertebrate classes. Traits correlated with population structure and study area explained 35%-45% of the variation in GDARs. Across genetic diversity metrics, prediction accuracy was highest for GDARs estimated from allele count compared to allelic richness and gene diversity. Our findings suggest there are opportunities for refining taxon-specific GDARs to predict genetic diversity loss following area loss in the absence of genetic data.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology Letters
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70306
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variability, Drivers, and Utility of Genetic Diversity‐Area Relationships in Terrestrial Vertebrates

Ecology Letters
Genetic diversity and population structure
article

Variability, Drivers, and Utility of Genetic Diversity‐Area Relationships in Terrestrial Vertebrates

article en

Abstract

Maintaining genetic diversity within and among populations is critical for conservation and a prominent goal of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. However, direct estimates of genetic diversity are unavailable for most species, and time and resources are insufficient to fill these substantial data gaps and meet conservation target timelines. We evaluated a proxy-based prediction of genetic diversity loss, the Genetic Diversity Area Relationship (GDAR), which describes relationships between genetic diversity and the geographic area occupied by a species. We estimated differences in three metrics of genetic diversity relative to sample area using 55 previously published datasets from 51 species. GDARs were highly variable across species and strongly dependent on population structure, with no clear differences across vertebrate classes. Traits correlated with population structure and study area explained 35%-45% of the variation in GDARs. Across genetic diversity metrics, prediction accuracy was highest for GDARs estimated from allele count compared to allelic richness and gene diversity. Our findings suggest there are opportunities for refining taxon-specific GDARs to predict genetic diversity loss following area loss in the absence of genetic data.

Ecology LettersVol. 29(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Dalhousie University (CA), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Morton Arboretum (US), Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M (DE), Yale University (US), LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (DE), University of Manitoba (CA)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig, U.S. Geological Survey, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Genetic diversity and population structure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Variability, Drivers, and Utility of Genetic Diversity‐Area Relationships in Terrestrial Vertebrates · Ecology Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS