Age- and Sex-Adjusted Myocardial Flow Reserve Percentiles for Personalized Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles provide a reliable, clinically actionable measure of vascular health, improving cardiovascular risk stratification by better capturing age- and sex-related heterogeneity in vascular risk. Compared with traditional fixed-threshold approaches, MFR percentiles demonstrate improved predictive performance for cardiovascular risk assessment across diverse patient populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.30.25343223
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age- and Sex-Adjusted Myocardial Flow Reserve Percentiles for Personalized Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Jiaming Liang, R. Blankstein, M. Di Carli, Leandro N. Slipczuk et al.
medRxiv
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Age- and Sex-Adjusted Myocardial Flow Reserve Percentiles for Personalized Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Jiaming Liang, R. Blankstein, M. Di Carli, Leandro N. Slipczuk, Ludovic Trinquart, René R. Sevag Packard, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Andrew Jeffrey Einstein, Viet T. Le, Ronny R. Buechel, J. Hainer, Mark I. Travin, Wanda Acampa, Leanne Barrett, Simone Soares Brandão, Stacey Knight, Thomas L. Rosamond, Erick Alexanderson, PJ Slomka, Diana M. Lopez, Steve Mason, D A M I N I Dey, Sylvain Carre, Brittany N Weber, M A R K Lemley, Mouaz H Al-Mallah, Sanjay Divakaran, Isabel Carvajal-Juarez, Sharmila Dorbala, Giselle Ramirez Orozco, Daniel Berman, Daniel Huck, Lee Joseph, Jenifer M Brown, Samuel Wopperer
article en

Abstract

Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles provide a reliable, clinically actionable measure of vascular health, improving cardiovascular risk stratification by better capturing age- and sex-related heterogeneity in vascular risk. Compared with traditional fixed-threshold approaches, MFR percentiles demonstrate improved predictive performance for cardiovascular risk assessment across diverse patient populations.

medRxiv
Tufts University (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), West Los Angeles College (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), Houston Methodist (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of Kansas (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), The University of Kansas Health System (US), Intermountain Medical Center (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Montefiore Health System (US), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Instituto Nacional de Cardiología (MX), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Amgen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases, Novo Nordisk, Sun Pharma, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.