Saline versus metronidazole peritoneal lavage in operated cases of peritonitis

Background: Peritonitis is a life-threatening surgical emergency most often caused by gastrointestinal perforations. Intraoperative peritoneal lavage aids in reducing infectious load, but saline alone lacks antimicrobial properties. Metronidazole lavage may enhance infection control by directly targeting anaerobes within the peritoneal cavity. Aims and Objectives: The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of intraoperative metronidazole lavage versus saline lavage in reducing post-operative complications, sepsis, and hospital stay in patients undergoing surgery for secondary peritonitis. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized interventional study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College, Jhansi, over 18 months. A total of 100 adult patients with perforation peritonitis were randomized into two groups: Group A (n=50) received saline plus metronidazole lavage, whereas Group B (n=50) received saline alone. Baseline demographics, causes of perforation, operative details, post-operative complications, and outcomes were recorded. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v21, with Chi-square and t-tests applied; P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age was 47.8 years, with males comprising 67%. Gastric perforation was the most common cause (42%). Mean operative time was shorter in the metronidazole group (116.58 min) compared to saline (134.88 min), though not significant (P=0.07). Post-operative superficial surgical site infection (SSI) was lower in Group A (20%) than Group B (40%, P=0.04). Severe sepsis (systemic inflammatory response syndrome >2) occurred in 22% versus 44%, respectively (P=0.03). Mean hospital stay was significantly reduced in the metronidazole group (5.9 vs. 8.1 days, P=0.001). Conclusion: Metronidazole lavage significantly reduced post-operative sepsis, SSIs, and length of hospital stay, making it a safe, effective, and economical adjunct in peritonitis surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v17i1.4924
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Saline versus metronidazole peritoneal lavage in operated cases of peritonitis

Albail Singh Yadav, Neha Bharti, Saurabh Purohit
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Saline versus metronidazole peritoneal lavage in operated cases of peritonitis

Albail Singh Yadav, Neha Bharti, Saurabh Purohit
article en

Abstract

Background: Peritonitis is a life-threatening surgical emergency most often caused by gastrointestinal perforations. Intraoperative peritoneal lavage aids in reducing infectious load, but saline alone lacks antimicrobial properties. Metronidazole lavage may enhance infection control by directly targeting anaerobes within the peritoneal cavity. Aims and Objectives: The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of intraoperative metronidazole lavage versus saline lavage in reducing post-operative complications, sepsis, and hospital stay in patients undergoing surgery for secondary peritonitis. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized interventional study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College, Jhansi, over 18 months. A total of 100 adult patients with perforation peritonitis were randomized into two groups: Group A (n=50) received saline plus metronidazole lavage, whereas Group B (n=50) received saline alone. Baseline demographics, causes of perforation, operative details, post-operative complications, and outcomes were recorded. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v21, with Chi-square and t-tests applied; P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age was 47.8 years, with males comprising 67%. Gastric perforation was the most common cause (42%). Mean operative time was shorter in the metronidazole group (116.58 min) compared to saline (134.88 min), though not significant (P=0.07). Post-operative superficial surgical site infection (SSI) was lower in Group A (20%) than Group B (40%, P=0.04). Severe sepsis (systemic inflammatory response syndrome >2) occurred in 22% versus 44%, respectively (P=0.03). Mean hospital stay was significantly reduced in the metronidazole group (5.9 vs. 8.1 days, P=0.001). Conclusion: Metronidazole lavage significantly reduced post-operative sepsis, SSIs, and length of hospital stay, making it a safe, effective, and economical adjunct in peritonitis surgery.

Asian Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 17(1)
Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.