Is Counterpoise Method a Proper Procedure for Evaluating the Dispersion Energy?

The counterpoise (CP) method, widely used to evaluate the basis set superposition error (BSSE) inherent in the supermolecular approach, is critically examined in the study of noncovalent interaction between rare gas atoms. Potential energy curves for the rare gas dimers (He<sub>2</sub>, Ne<sub>2</sub>, and Ar<sub>2</sub>) are calculated with and without CP correction using the aug-cc-pVxZ basis sets (x = D, T, Q, 5) at multiple levels of theory (HF, MP2, MP4, and CCSD(T)). While CP correction effectively removes BSSE in the HF energy, which constitutes the major component of the total energies, in contrast, applying the CP correction energy to the electron correlation energy yields a positive BSSE, leading to systematically shallower potential energy curves, particularly when smaller basis sets are employed. We analyzed this contrasting behavior of the HF and electron correlation energy components in terms of the orbital basis inconsistency (OBI) and configuration basis inconsistency (CBI).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.70292
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Counterpoise Method a Proper Procedure for Evaluating the Dispersion Energy?

Hidenori Matsuzawa, Suehiro Iwata, Yuki Kano
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
article

Is Counterpoise Method a Proper Procedure for Evaluating the Dispersion Energy?

Hidenori Matsuzawa, Suehiro Iwata, Yuki Kano
article en

Abstract

The counterpoise (CP) method, widely used to evaluate the basis set superposition error (BSSE) inherent in the supermolecular approach, is critically examined in the study of noncovalent interaction between rare gas atoms. Potential energy curves for the rare gas dimers (He<sub>2</sub>, Ne<sub>2</sub>, and Ar<sub>2</sub>) are calculated with and without CP correction using the aug-cc-pVxZ basis sets (x = D, T, Q, 5) at multiple levels of theory (HF, MP2, MP4, and CCSD(T)). While CP correction effectively removes BSSE in the HF energy, which constitutes the major component of the total energies, in contrast, applying the CP correction energy to the electron correlation energy yields a positive BSSE, leading to systematically shallower potential energy curves, particularly when smaller basis sets are employed. We analyzed this contrasting behavior of the HF and electron correlation energy components in terms of the orbital basis inconsistency (OBI) and configuration basis inconsistency (CBI).

Journal of Computational ChemistryVol. 47(1)
The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP), Institute for Molecular Science (JP), Chiba Institute of Technology (JP)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is Counterpoise Method a Proper Procedure for Evaluating the Dispersion Energy? — Hidenori Matsuzawa, Suehiro Iwata, et al. · Journal of Computational Chemistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS