Explicit FEM Analysis of Soil–Disc Interaction for APS-Coated Notched Harrow Discs in Representative Agricultural Soils

The present work develops an explicit dynamic finite element model of soil–disc interaction for a notched harrow disc, aiming to quantify how APS coatings, soil type and disc–soil friction influence stresses in the disc and surrounding soil. The model reproduces a four-gang offset harrow operating at 7 km/h, 0.15 m working depth, with 18°disc angle and 15° tilt angle, and compares an uncoated steel disc with three APS-coated variants (P1 Metco 71NS, P2 Metco 136F, P3 Metco 45C-NS). Mechanical properties of the substrate and coatings are obtained from micro-indentation tests and introduced via a bilinear steel model and Johnson–Cook plasticity for the coatings, while disc–soil friction coefficients are calibrated from microscratch measurements. Soil behaviour is described using the AUTODYN Granular model for four representative agricultural soils, spanning sandy loam to saturated heavy clay. Results show that the uncoated disc develops von Mises stresses in the disc–soil contact region of ≈150–220 MPa, with intermediate-stiffness soils being most critical. APS coatings significantly alter both the level and distribution of stresses: P2, the stiffest ceramic, yields the highest stresses (≈421–448 MPa), P1 keeps stresses near the baseline while shielding the substrate through extended plastic zones, and P3 provides an intermediate, more uniformly distributed stress regime. Increasing disc–soil friction systematically amplifies von Mises stresses in the contact region, especially for P2. Overall, the calibrated explicit model captures the coupled influence of soil properties, coating stiffness and friction, and indicates that P1 is better suited for light-to-medium soils, P3 offers the most balanced response in medium-to-stiff soils, whereas P2 should be reserved for highly abrasive conditions and used with caution in cohesive soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010395
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explicit FEM Analysis of Soil–Disc Interaction for APS-Coated Notched Harrow Discs in Representative Agricultural Soils

Ana Tufescu, Vlad Nicolae Arsenoaia, B Istrate, Marcelin I. Benchea et al.
Applied Sciences
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
article

Explicit FEM Analysis of Soil–Disc Interaction for APS-Coated Notched Harrow Discs in Representative Agricultural Soils

Ana Tufescu, Vlad Nicolae Arsenoaia, B Istrate, Marcelin I. Benchea, Vitali Vișanu, Corneliu Munteanu, Fabian Cezar Lupu, Iurie Melnic
article en

Abstract

The present work develops an explicit dynamic finite element model of soil–disc interaction for a notched harrow disc, aiming to quantify how APS coatings, soil type and disc–soil friction influence stresses in the disc and surrounding soil. The model reproduces a four-gang offset harrow operating at 7 km/h, 0.15 m working depth, with 18°disc angle and 15° tilt angle, and compares an uncoated steel disc with three APS-coated variants (P1 Metco 71NS, P2 Metco 136F, P3 Metco 45C-NS). Mechanical properties of the substrate and coatings are obtained from micro-indentation tests and introduced via a bilinear steel model and Johnson–Cook plasticity for the coatings, while disc–soil friction coefficients are calibrated from microscratch measurements. Soil behaviour is described using the AUTODYN Granular model for four representative agricultural soils, spanning sandy loam to saturated heavy clay. Results show that the uncoated disc develops von Mises stresses in the disc–soil contact region of ≈150–220 MPa, with intermediate-stiffness soils being most critical. APS coatings significantly alter both the level and distribution of stresses: P2, the stiffest ceramic, yields the highest stresses (≈421–448 MPa), P1 keeps stresses near the baseline while shielding the substrate through extended plastic zones, and P3 provides an intermediate, more uniformly distributed stress regime. Increasing disc–soil friction systematically amplifies von Mises stresses in the contact region, especially for P2. Overall, the calibrated explicit model captures the coupled influence of soil properties, coating stiffness and friction, and indicates that P1 is better suited for light-to-medium soils, P3 offers the most balanced response in medium-to-stiff soils, whereas P2 should be reserved for highly abrasive conditions and used with caution in cohesive soils.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(1)
Technical University of Moldova (MD), Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România (RO), "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" Iasi University of Life Sciences (RO), Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iași (RO)
Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.