Letting sleeping wasps lie: general-purpose AI models and copyright protection under the European Union AI Act

Abstract This article addresses two principal research objectives: first, to examine how and to what extent the provisions of the EU AI Act (EUAIA) dedicated to general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) models (GPAIm) govern the intersection of copyright and AI, through the scrutiny of major legal challenges raised by AI manipulations of copyrighted material, and, second, to distil whether and how the EUAIA’s provisions on prohibited AI practices can be applicable to AI-based copyright infringement. The author posits that the provision of Article 5(1)(a) EUAIA, which does not explicitly refer to copyright, can be interpreted in a sense that it allows us to qualify the use of copyrighted material for creating manipulated content as a ‘purposefully manipulative or deceptive technique’, but only once the other criteria of Article 5(1)(a)—not related to copyright law—are fulfilled. A specific, customized methodological approach with three main characteristics is adopted to successfully address the objectives outlined above. First, the legal content analysis of the EU legislation is teleological, dynamic and holistic. Second, the literature review is combined with references to relevant jurisprudence and insights into legal reasoning of policy makers and practitioners. Third, the methodological approach is, whenever necessary, based on convergence of legal studies with interdisciplinary explorations of political science, psychology, economics and technologies. The article argues that, by refraining from a more comprehensive regulation of the intersection between GPAIm and copyright law, the EU legislators have inadvertently created a fertile environment for a multitude of interpretative and enforcement challenges of the Union’s regulatory framework in the Member States.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaf084
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Letting sleeping wasps lie: general-purpose AI models and copyright protection under the European Union AI Act

Uroš Ćemalović
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Letting sleeping wasps lie: general-purpose AI models and copyright protection under the European Union AI Act

Uroš Ćemalović
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article addresses two principal research objectives: first, to examine how and to what extent the provisions of the EU AI Act (EUAIA) dedicated to general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) models (GPAIm) govern the intersection of copyright and AI, through the scrutiny of major legal challenges raised by AI manipulations of copyrighted material, and, second, to distil whether and how the EUAIA’s provisions on prohibited AI practices can be applicable to AI-based copyright infringement. The author posits that the provision of Article 5(1)(a) EUAIA, which does not explicitly refer to copyright, can be interpreted in a sense that it allows us to qualify the use of copyrighted material for creating manipulated content as a ‘purposefully manipulative or deceptive technique’, but only once the other criteria of Article 5(1)(a)—not related to copyright law—are fulfilled. A specific, customized methodological approach with three main characteristics is adopted to successfully address the objectives outlined above. First, the legal content analysis of the EU legislation is teleological, dynamic and holistic. Second, the literature review is combined with references to relevant jurisprudence and insights into legal reasoning of policy makers and practitioners. Third, the methodological approach is, whenever necessary, based on convergence of legal studies with interdisciplinary explorations of political science, psychology, economics and technologies. The article argues that, by refraining from a more comprehensive regulation of the intersection between GPAIm and copyright law, the EU legislators have inadvertently created a fertile environment for a multitude of interpretative and enforcement challenges of the Union’s regulatory framework in the Member States.

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & PracticeVol. 21(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.