Maximum Shoulder Torque and Muscle Activation During Standing Arm Flexion: Reference Data for Biomechanical and Ergonomic Applications

<b>Objectives</b>: Shoulder joint strength and muscle activation during overhead reaching are critical for ergonomic task design, rehabilitation, and exoskeleton support. The objective of this study was to characterize maximum shoulder torque and flexor muscle activation profiles across functional elevation angles in healthy adult males. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 14 healthy male participants performed maximum voluntary isometric contractions at eight arm elevation angles (90-160°, sagittal plane, and standing). Shoulder torque was measured using a calibrated force sensor and normalized to each participant's overall maximum. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the anterior deltoid, medial deltoid, biceps brachii, and clavicular pectoralis major; EMG for the medial deltoid, biceps brachii, and pectoralis major was normalized to muscle-specific isometric MVCs, whereas the anterior deltoid was normalized to the peak value at 90° during the main task. All EMG signals were smoothed using a 0.5 s RMS-based moving average window. Linear regression was used to analyze the torque-angle relationship, and linear mixed-effects models were used to test EMG differences across angles. Summary statistics included mean ± SD, coefficient of variation, R<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i>-values (significance threshold: <i>p</i> < 0.05), Cohen's d, and 95% confidence intervals where appropriate. <b>Results</b>: Maximum torque declined with elevation angle (y = -0.6317x + 157.21; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99), from 77.2 Nm at 90° to 43.2 Nm at 160°, with normalized values from 99.6% to 55.3%. Medial deltoid activation increased significantly with elevation (<i>p</i> < 0.001, from 87.5 ± 19.9% at 90° to 109.4 ± 25.6% at 150°), while pectoralis major declined sharply (<i>p</i> < 0.001, from 68.9 ± 24.2% at 90° to 19.8 ± 5.6% at 160°). Anterior deltoid and biceps brachii activations were high and showed no systematic change with angle (<i>p</i> = 0.37 and 0.81, respectively), remaining within approximately 95-102% and 70-85% of their reference levels across 90-160°. Normalization reduced inter-participant variability, clarifying muscle-specific trends. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study provides preliminary biomechanical reference values for shoulder torque and muscle activation across elevation angles in healthy males under isometric standing conditions, confirming an inverse torque-angle relationship and distinct muscle activation strategies at higher positions. These findings may inform ergonomic assessment and exoskeleton design, while recognizing that generalization to dynamic tasks and other populations requires caution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11010020
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximum Shoulder Torque and Muscle Activation During Standing Arm Flexion: Reference Data for Biomechanical and Ergonomic Applications

Thomas Angeli, Florian Wimmer, Margit Gföhler, Michael Kurz et al.
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Maximum Shoulder Torque and Muscle Activation During Standing Arm Flexion: Reference Data for Biomechanical and Ergonomic Applications

Thomas Angeli, Florian Wimmer, Margit Gföhler, Michael Kurz, Georgios Aronis, Harald Hackl
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: Shoulder joint strength and muscle activation during overhead reaching are critical for ergonomic task design, rehabilitation, and exoskeleton support. The objective of this study was to characterize maximum shoulder torque and flexor muscle activation profiles across functional elevation angles in healthy adult males. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 14 healthy male participants performed maximum voluntary isometric contractions at eight arm elevation angles (90-160°, sagittal plane, and standing). Shoulder torque was measured using a calibrated force sensor and normalized to each participant's overall maximum. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the anterior deltoid, medial deltoid, biceps brachii, and clavicular pectoralis major; EMG for the medial deltoid, biceps brachii, and pectoralis major was normalized to muscle-specific isometric MVCs, whereas the anterior deltoid was normalized to the peak value at 90° during the main task. All EMG signals were smoothed using a 0.5 s RMS-based moving average window. Linear regression was used to analyze the torque-angle relationship, and linear mixed-effects models were used to test EMG differences across angles. Summary statistics included mean ± SD, coefficient of variation, R<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i>-values (significance threshold: <i>p</i> < 0.05), Cohen's d, and 95% confidence intervals where appropriate. <b>Results</b>: Maximum torque declined with elevation angle (y = -0.6317x + 157.21; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99), from 77.2 Nm at 90° to 43.2 Nm at 160°, with normalized values from 99.6% to 55.3%. Medial deltoid activation increased significantly with elevation (<i>p</i> < 0.001, from 87.5 ± 19.9% at 90° to 109.4 ± 25.6% at 150°), while pectoralis major declined sharply (<i>p</i> < 0.001, from 68.9 ± 24.2% at 90° to 19.8 ± 5.6% at 160°). Anterior deltoid and biceps brachii activations were high and showed no systematic change with angle (<i>p</i> = 0.37 and 0.81, respectively), remaining within approximately 95-102% and 70-85% of their reference levels across 90-160°. Normalization reduced inter-participant variability, clarifying muscle-specific trends. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study provides preliminary biomechanical reference values for shoulder torque and muscle activation across elevation angles in healthy males under isometric standing conditions, confirming an inverse torque-angle relationship and distinct muscle activation strategies at higher positions. These findings may inform ergonomic assessment and exoskeleton design, while recognizing that generalization to dynamic tasks and other populations requires caution.

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 11(1)
TU Wien (AT), Machine Science (US)
Technische Universität Wien, Technische Universität Wien Bibliothek
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.