Effectiveness of Criminal Sanctions Against Union-Busting Actions by Media Companies

This research explores the enforcement of criminal sanctions against union-busting practices in Indonesia, with a particular focus on the conflict between the CNN Indonesia Workers’ Solidarity (SPCI) and PT. CNN Indonesia. Employing a juridical-normative approach, the study reviews legal frameworks such as Law No. 21 of 2000 on Trade Unions and the Indonesian Criminal Code, while drawing comparisons with labor court rulings in Belgium, Germany, and France. The findings reveal that, although Indonesia’s legal system formally classifies union busting as a criminal act, its implementation remains ineffective due to the dominance of civil or bipartite settlements that rarely impose real sanctions. The research emphasizes the need for stronger institutional commitment and a more proactive role from law enforcement bodies to safeguard workers’ rights and ensure corporate accountability. Strengthening these measures will help harmonize Indonesia’s labor law with international standards promoted by the International Labour Organization (ILO).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mathematics Instruction Social Research and Opinion
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v4i4.974
Primary Topic
Comparative and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Criminal Sanctions Against Union-Busting Actions by Media Companies

Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba, Syifadilla Subagyo Putri
Journal of Mathematics Instruction Social Research and Opinion
Comparative and International Law Studies
article

Effectiveness of Criminal Sanctions Against Union-Busting Actions by Media Companies

Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba, Syifadilla Subagyo Putri
article en

Abstract

This research explores the enforcement of criminal sanctions against union-busting practices in Indonesia, with a particular focus on the conflict between the CNN Indonesia Workers’ Solidarity (SPCI) and PT. CNN Indonesia. Employing a juridical-normative approach, the study reviews legal frameworks such as Law No. 21 of 2000 on Trade Unions and the Indonesian Criminal Code, while drawing comparisons with labor court rulings in Belgium, Germany, and France. The findings reveal that, although Indonesia’s legal system formally classifies union busting as a criminal act, its implementation remains ineffective due to the dominance of civil or bipartite settlements that rarely impose real sanctions. The research emphasizes the need for stronger institutional commitment and a more proactive role from law enforcement bodies to safeguard workers’ rights and ensure corporate accountability. Strengthening these measures will help harmonize Indonesia’s labor law with international standards promoted by the International Labour Organization (ILO).

Journal of Mathematics Instruction Social Research and OpinionVol. 4(4)
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta (ID)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Comparative and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.