Sensitivity analysis of immunohistochemical examination for ROS1 rearrangement compared to RT-PCR in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background The c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearrangement is one of the actionable targets in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), particularly the adenocarcinoma subtype. Early detection of this mutation is crucial for determining appropriate therapy. While Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for ROS1 rearrangement detection, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is often used as a screening method due to its accessibility and rapid processing time. Aim This study evaluates the sensitivity and specificity of IHC compared to RT-PCR in detecting ROS1 rearrangement. Materials and methods This was a diagnostic cross-sectional study conducted at H. Adam Malik Hospital and Santa Elisabeth Hospital in Medan between December 2022 and December 2023. A total of 90 patients with NSCLC adenocarcinoma who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Collected data included clinical characteristics and results of ROS1 rearrangement testing using RT-PCR and IHC. The validity of IHC was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy, using RT-PCR as the reference method. Results Most patients were male (66.7%), with a mean age of 56.46 years, and the majority were former smokers (67.8%). Among the 90 patients, 8 (8.9%) were ROS1-positive by RT-PCR and 7 (7.8%) were ROS1-positive by IHC. The sensitivity of IHC compared to RT-PCR was 37.5%, specificity was 95.1%, PPV was 42.9%, and NPV was 94.0%. The overall diagnostic accuracy of IHC was 90.0%. Conclusion Immunohistochemistry shows high specificity and negative predictive value, making it a reasonably effective screening tool for ROS1 rearrangement detection. However, its low sensitivity and positive predictive value indicate that IHC should not be used as a standalone diagnostic method for determining ROS1 status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-025-00829-x
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity analysis of immunohistochemical examination for ROS1 rearrangement compared to RT-PCR in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

Noni Novisari Soeroso, Putri Chairani Eyanoer, Setia Putra Tarigan, Adewita Ritonga
Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Sensitivity analysis of immunohistochemical examination for ROS1 rearrangement compared to RT-PCR in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

Noni Novisari Soeroso, Putri Chairani Eyanoer, Setia Putra Tarigan, Adewita Ritonga
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearrangement is one of the actionable targets in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), particularly the adenocarcinoma subtype. Early detection of this mutation is crucial for determining appropriate therapy. While Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for ROS1 rearrangement detection, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is often used as a screening method due to its accessibility and rapid processing time. Aim This study evaluates the sensitivity and specificity of IHC compared to RT-PCR in detecting ROS1 rearrangement. Materials and methods This was a diagnostic cross-sectional study conducted at H. Adam Malik Hospital and Santa Elisabeth Hospital in Medan between December 2022 and December 2023. A total of 90 patients with NSCLC adenocarcinoma who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Collected data included clinical characteristics and results of ROS1 rearrangement testing using RT-PCR and IHC. The validity of IHC was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy, using RT-PCR as the reference method. Results Most patients were male (66.7%), with a mean age of 56.46 years, and the majority were former smokers (67.8%). Among the 90 patients, 8 (8.9%) were ROS1-positive by RT-PCR and 7 (7.8%) were ROS1-positive by IHC. The sensitivity of IHC compared to RT-PCR was 37.5%, specificity was 95.1%, PPV was 42.9%, and NPV was 94.0%. The overall diagnostic accuracy of IHC was 90.0%. Conclusion Immunohistochemistry shows high specificity and negative predictive value, making it a reasonably effective screening tool for ROS1 rearrangement detection. However, its low sensitivity and positive predictive value indicate that IHC should not be used as a standalone diagnostic method for determining ROS1 status.

Egyptian Journal of Medical Human GeneticsVol. 26(1)
Universitas Sumatera Utara (ID)
Universitas Sumatera Utara, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.