Agricultural cooperatives and the holdup problem: the case of the New Zealand dairy industry

Purpose This study aims to examine how pricing transparency affects organizational boundaries in agricultural markets. The authors use the introduction of the Global Dairy Trade auction (2008) and Farmgate Milk Price system (2010) as exogenous shocks that dramatically improved price discovery for dairy commodities in New Zealand. Design/methodology/approach Using difference-in-differences methodology, the authors compare regions with both cooperative and investor-owned firm (IOF) processing facilities against cooperative-only regions from 2002 to 2015. Findings The results reveal that cooperatives lost approximately 8% of market share following these pricing transparency improvements in regions where IOFs were active. Originality/value This study contributes to organizational economics by showing how external market infrastructure changes can shift optimal firm boundaries, with implications for agricultural policy and cooperative governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Accounting Review
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/par-05-2025-0098
Primary Topic
Cooperative Studies and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agricultural cooperatives and the holdup problem: the case of the New Zealand dairy industry

C. Wang, Henk Berkman, Norman Wong
Pacific Accounting Review
Cooperative Studies and Economics
article

Agricultural cooperatives and the holdup problem: the case of the New Zealand dairy industry

C. Wang, Henk Berkman, Norman Wong
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how pricing transparency affects organizational boundaries in agricultural markets. The authors use the introduction of the Global Dairy Trade auction (2008) and Farmgate Milk Price system (2010) as exogenous shocks that dramatically improved price discovery for dairy commodities in New Zealand. Design/methodology/approach Using difference-in-differences methodology, the authors compare regions with both cooperative and investor-owned firm (IOF) processing facilities against cooperative-only regions from 2002 to 2015. Findings The results reveal that cooperatives lost approximately 8% of market share following these pricing transparency improvements in regions where IOFs were active. Originality/value This study contributes to organizational economics by showing how external market infrastructure changes can shift optimal firm boundaries, with implications for agricultural policy and cooperative governance.

Pacific Accounting ReviewVol. 38(2)
University of Auckland (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Cooperative Studies and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.