Learning Health Systems provide a glide path to safe landing for AI in health

Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds significant promise for healthcare but often struggles to transition from development to clinical integration. This paper argues that Learning Health Systems (LHS)-socio-technical ecosystems designed for continuous data-driven improvement-provide a potential "glide path" for safe, sustainable AI deployment. Just as modern aviation depends on instrument landing systems, the safe and effective integration of AI into healthcare requires the socio-technical infrastructure of LHSs, that enable iterative development and monitoring of AI tools, integrating clinical, technical, and ethical considerations through stakeholder collaboration. They address key challenges in AI implementation, including model generalizability, workflow integration, and transparency, by embedding co-creation, real-world evaluation, and continuous learning into care processes. Unlike static deployments, LHSs support the dynamic evolution of AI systems, incorporating feedback and recalibration to mitigate performance drift and bias. Moreover, they embed governance and regulatory functions-clarifying accountability, supporting data and model provenance, and upholding FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. LHSs also promote "human-in-the-loop" safety through structured studies of human-AI interaction and shared decision-making. The paper outlines practical steps to align AI with LHS frameworks, including investment in data infrastructure, continuous model monitoring, and fostering a learning culture. Embedding AI in LHSs transforms implementation from a one-time event into a sustained, evidence-based learning process that aligns innovation with clinical realities, ultimately advancing patient care, health equity, and system resilience. The arguments build on insights from an international workshop hosted in 2025, offering a strategic vision for the future of AI in healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103346
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning Health Systems provide a glide path to safe landing for AI in health

Olga Kostopoulou, Sanjay Modgil, Ingrid Wolfe, Philip Scott et al.
1 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Learning Health Systems provide a glide path to safe landing for AI in health

Olga Kostopoulou, Sanjay Modgil, Ingrid Wolfe, Philip Scott, Daniel Leightley, Brendan Delaney, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar, Kelly Zhang, Vasa Curcin, Charles Friedman, Neil Cockburn, Matthew Maddocks, Ahmad Alkhatib, Olivia Dann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds significant promise for healthcare but often struggles to transition from development to clinical integration. This paper argues that Learning Health Systems (LHS)-socio-technical ecosystems designed for continuous data-driven improvement-provide a potential "glide path" for safe, sustainable AI deployment. Just as modern aviation depends on instrument landing systems, the safe and effective integration of AI into healthcare requires the socio-technical infrastructure of LHSs, that enable iterative development and monitoring of AI tools, integrating clinical, technical, and ethical considerations through stakeholder collaboration. They address key challenges in AI implementation, including model generalizability, workflow integration, and transparency, by embedding co-creation, real-world evaluation, and continuous learning into care processes. Unlike static deployments, LHSs support the dynamic evolution of AI systems, incorporating feedback and recalibration to mitigate performance drift and bias. Moreover, they embed governance and regulatory functions-clarifying accountability, supporting data and model provenance, and upholding FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. LHSs also promote "human-in-the-loop" safety through structured studies of human-AI interaction and shared decision-making. The paper outlines practical steps to align AI with LHS frameworks, including investment in data infrastructure, continuous model monitoring, and fostering a learning culture. Embedding AI in LHSs transforms implementation from a one-time event into a sustained, evidence-based learning process that aligns innovation with clinical realities, ultimately advancing patient care, health equity, and system resilience. The arguments build on insights from an international workshop hosted in 2025, offering a strategic vision for the future of AI in healthcare.

Artificial Intelligence in MedicineVol. 173
King's College London (GB), University of Michigan (US), Imperial College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Wales Trinity Saint David (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.