Circular economy adoption in Hong Kong transitional housing: a multi-theoretical framework for institutional transformation

Purpose The three-to-five-year wait for public housing in Hong Kong (HK) illustrates the housing shortage. The government has resorted to various approaches of transitional housing supplies. One of which is building transitional housing on vacant land as a temporary solution. Such housing facilities are built for a minimum of seven years or even less. When the hosting site is no longer accessible, the transitional housing is deconstructed and moved to a new available location to serve a second lifecycle. Ensuring circular economy (CE) adoption in transitional housing is essential to reduce construction and demolition waste and to promote circular transitional housing. Design/methodology/approach Using institutional and innovation adoption theories as a foundation, this study identifies key institutional obstacles to CE adoption in transitional housing in HK. Major CE barriers from a review were refined through expert interviews. Collected questionnaire data from construction professionals were analysed. Findings Findings revealed significant differences in underlying institutional barriers between the views of CE adopters and non-adopters. From the perspective of CE adopters, regulative barriers were the most critical, followed by normative barriers. However, from the non-adopters, normative barriers were paramount and then regulative barriers. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted with a relatively small sample size (i.e., 51) due to difficulties in collecting responses to the questionnaire. Originality/value Uncovering the barriers is the first step to developing a viable solution for CE in transitional housing. The findings could inform decision-makers of general and tailored policies to expedite CE transition by innovators, early adopters and early majority and to begin CE implementation by the late majority and the laggards to promote circular transitional housing in HK and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-09-2025-0576
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circular economy adoption in Hong Kong transitional housing: a multi-theoretical framework for institutional transformation

Michael Atafo Adabre, D J Edwards, Aws Chan, Amos Darko et al.
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Circular economy adoption in Hong Kong transitional housing: a multi-theoretical framework for institutional transformation

Michael Atafo Adabre, D J Edwards, Aws Chan, Amos Darko, Mohammad Reza Hosseini, Caleb Debrah
article en

Abstract

Purpose The three-to-five-year wait for public housing in Hong Kong (HK) illustrates the housing shortage. The government has resorted to various approaches of transitional housing supplies. One of which is building transitional housing on vacant land as a temporary solution. Such housing facilities are built for a minimum of seven years or even less. When the hosting site is no longer accessible, the transitional housing is deconstructed and moved to a new available location to serve a second lifecycle. Ensuring circular economy (CE) adoption in transitional housing is essential to reduce construction and demolition waste and to promote circular transitional housing. Design/methodology/approach Using institutional and innovation adoption theories as a foundation, this study identifies key institutional obstacles to CE adoption in transitional housing in HK. Major CE barriers from a review were refined through expert interviews. Collected questionnaire data from construction professionals were analysed. Findings Findings revealed significant differences in underlying institutional barriers between the views of CE adopters and non-adopters. From the perspective of CE adopters, regulative barriers were the most critical, followed by normative barriers. However, from the non-adopters, normative barriers were paramount and then regulative barriers. Research limitations/implications The study was conducted with a relatively small sample size (i.e., 51) due to difficulties in collecting responses to the questionnaire. Originality/value Uncovering the barriers is the first step to developing a viable solution for CE in transitional housing. The findings could inform decision-makers of general and tailored policies to expedite CE transition by innovators, early adopters and early majority and to begin CE implementation by the late majority and the laggards to promote circular transitional housing in HK and beyond.

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Birmingham City University (GB), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Deakin University (AU), University of Johannesburg (ZA), State Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Built Environment (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.