Underground Coal Gasification Technology: A Review of Advantages, Challenges, and Economics

Against the background of global energy transformation and low-carbon development, numerous difficult-to-mine coal resources (e.g., deep, thin coal seams and low-quality coal) remain underdeveloped, leading to potential resource waste. This study systematically summarizes the feasibility of developing these resources via underground coal gasification (UCG) technology, clarifies its basic chemical/physical processes and typical gas supply/gas withdrawal arrangements, and establishes an analytical framework covering resource utilization, gas production quality control, environmental impact, and cost efficiency. Comparative evaluations are conducted among UCG, surface coal gasification (SCG), natural gas conversion, and electrolysis-based hydrogen production. Results show that UCG exhibits significant advantages: wide resource adaptability (recovering over 60% of difficult-to-mine coal resources), better environmental performance than traditional coal mining and SCG (e.g., less surface disturbance, 50% solid waste reduction), and obvious economic benefits (total capital investment without CCS is 65–82% of SCG, and hydrogen production cost ranges from 0.1 to 0.14 USD/m3, significantly lower than SCG’s 0.23–0.27 USD/m3). However, UCG faces challenges, including environmental risks (groundwater pollution by heavy metals, syngas leakage), geological risks (ground subsidence, rock mass strength reduction), and technical bottlenecks (difficult ignition control, unstable large-scale production). Combined with carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology, UCG can reduce carbon emissions, but CCS only mitigates carbon impact rather than reversing it. UCG provides a large-scale, stable, and economical path for the efficient clean development of difficult-to-mine coal resources, contributing to global energy structure transformation and low-carbon development.