Reaction Pathways over ZnZrO <sub>2</sub> -Based Catalysts and Catalytic Sorbents

Reactive capture and conversion (RCC) is a process intensification approach that integrates CO<sub>2</sub> capture and hydrogenation within a single unit, removing the CO<sub>2</sub> purification and storage steps of traditional process flow schemes. This alters the catalytic step from a traditional steady-state (SS) flow process to a transient capture and conversion cycle, which could lead to product distributions distinct from those observed in conventional SS experiments. Such differences are investigated in the combined capture and hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol over a ZnZrO<sub>2</sub> catalyst and a ZnZrO<sub>2</sub> + NaNO<sub>3</sub>/Mg<sub>3</sub>AlO <i><sub>x</sub></i> catalytic sorbent (CS) using fixed-bed kinetic measurements, <i>in situ</i> diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS), and steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis-DRIFTS (SSITKA-DRIFTS). Under SS conditions, ZnZrO<sub>2</sub> produced methanol through sequential hydrogenation of HCOO* and CH<sub>3</sub>O* intermediates. On the contrary, CO was attributed primarily to CO<sub>2</sub> dissociation at oxygen vacancies, as supported by isotopic shifts and measured reaction orders. For the CS, isotopic switching experiments suggested that monodentate carbonate species (CO<sub>3</sub> <sup>2-</sup>, abbreviated as m-CO<sub>3</sub> <sup>2-</sup>) act as active intermediates that can be hydrogenated to HCOO* and subsequently to CH<sub>3</sub>O. Under RCC conditions, <i>in situ</i> DRIFTS and isotopic experiments reveal that m-CO<sub>3</sub> <sup>2-</sup> species formed during the CO<sub>2</sub> capture step follow two competing routes upon H<sub>2</sub> exposure: (i) direct hydrogenation to methane on the sorbent domain or (ii) migration of m-CO<sub>3</sub> <sup>2-</sup> to the ZnZrO<sub>2</sub> domain, where they are hydrogenated to methanol through the HCOO pathway. Overall, RCC enables carbonate hydrogenation routes not observed under SS cofeed conditions. Thus, the reaction pathways and rates during RCC can be different from operation under conventional SS conditions, and the product distribution is determined here by competition between carbonate hydrogenation on sorbent sites and migration to ZnZrO<sub>2</sub> for methanol synthesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Catalysis
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5c06895
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reaction Pathways over ZnZrO 2 -Based Catalysts and Catalytic Sorbents

Laura Proaño, Jordan Wielang, Christopher W. Jones
ACS Catalysis
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
article

Reaction Pathways over ZnZrO 2 -Based Catalysts and Catalytic Sorbents

Laura Proaño, Jordan Wielang, Christopher W. Jones
article en

Abstract

Reactive capture and conversion (RCC) is a process intensification approach that integrates CO<sub>2</sub> capture and hydrogenation within a single unit, removing the CO<sub>2</sub> purification and storage steps of traditional process flow schemes. This alters the catalytic step from a traditional steady-state (SS) flow process to a transient capture and conversion cycle, which could lead to product distributions distinct from those observed in conventional SS experiments. Such differences are investigated in the combined capture and hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol over a ZnZrO<sub>2</sub> catalyst and a ZnZrO<sub>2</sub> + NaNO<sub>3</sub>/Mg<sub>3</sub>AlO <i><sub>x</sub></i> catalytic sorbent (CS) using fixed-bed kinetic measurements, <i>in situ</i> diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS), and steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis-DRIFTS (SSITKA-DRIFTS). Under SS conditions, ZnZrO<sub>2</sub> produced methanol through sequential hydrogenation of HCOO* and CH<sub>3</sub>O* intermediates. On the contrary, CO was attributed primarily to CO<sub>2</sub> dissociation at oxygen vacancies, as supported by isotopic shifts and measured reaction orders. For the CS, isotopic switching experiments suggested that monodentate carbonate species (CO<sub>3</sub> <sup>2-</sup>, abbreviated as m-CO<sub>3</sub> <sup>2-</sup>) act as active intermediates that can be hydrogenated to HCOO* and subsequently to CH<sub>3</sub>O. Under RCC conditions, <i>in situ</i> DRIFTS and isotopic experiments reveal that m-CO<sub>3</sub> <sup>2-</sup> species formed during the CO<sub>2</sub> capture step follow two competing routes upon H<sub>2</sub> exposure: (i) direct hydrogenation to methane on the sorbent domain or (ii) migration of m-CO<sub>3</sub> <sup>2-</sup> to the ZnZrO<sub>2</sub> domain, where they are hydrogenated to methanol through the HCOO pathway. Overall, RCC enables carbonate hydrogenation routes not observed under SS cofeed conditions. Thus, the reaction pathways and rates during RCC can be different from operation under conventional SS conditions, and the product distribution is determined here by competition between carbonate hydrogenation on sorbent sites and migration to ZnZrO<sub>2</sub> for methanol synthesis.

ACS CatalysisVol. 16(2)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.