The Primacy of Processes and the Causes of the Russo‐Ukrainian War: A Rejoinder to ‘Patrimonial Imperialism’

ABSTRACT Pierzynski and Joseph explain the Russo‐Ukrainian war through systemic and individual‐level accounts but argue these are incomplete without addressing Russia's internal structure, which they term ‘patrimonial imperialism’. While their taxonomy mirrors the traditional IR ‘levels of analysis’, I suggest it obscures relational and historical dynamics. In this rejoinder, I also critique their rigid distinction between the actual and the real and between process and structure. Causal complexes are historically grounded relational processes. Alongside metatheoretical argumentation, I outline a process‐ontological and holistic critical realist explanation of the Russo‐Ukrainian war—one that situates it within global political‐economic dynamics, while also invoking concepts such as world time. This perspective allows for a nuanced attribution of responsibility and broadens the scope of normative considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70025
Primary Topic
World Systems and Global Transformations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Primacy of Processes and the Causes of the Russo‐Ukrainian War: A Rejoinder to ‘Patrimonial Imperialism’

Heikki Patomäki
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
World Systems and Global Transformations
article

The Primacy of Processes and the Causes of the Russo‐Ukrainian War: A Rejoinder to ‘Patrimonial Imperialism’

Heikki Patomäki
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pierzynski and Joseph explain the Russo‐Ukrainian war through systemic and individual‐level accounts but argue these are incomplete without addressing Russia's internal structure, which they term ‘patrimonial imperialism’. While their taxonomy mirrors the traditional IR ‘levels of analysis’, I suggest it obscures relational and historical dynamics. In this rejoinder, I also critique their rigid distinction between the actual and the real and between process and structure. Causal complexes are historically grounded relational processes. Alongside metatheoretical argumentation, I outline a process‐ontological and holistic critical realist explanation of the Russo‐Ukrainian war—one that situates it within global political‐economic dynamics, while also invoking concepts such as world time. This perspective allows for a nuanced attribution of responsibility and broadens the scope of normative considerations.

Journal for the Theory of Social BehaviourVol. 56(1)
University of Helsinki (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
World Systems and Global Transformations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Primacy of Processes and the Causes of the Russo‐Ukrainian War: A Rejoinder to ‘Patrimonial Imperialism’ — Heikki Patomäki · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS