DRIVERS OF THE COUNTRY-LEVEL SOCIAL COST OF CARBON

Climate change is expected to impose heterogeneous damages throughout the world due to varying levels of hazards, exposure, and vulnerability. The social cost of carbon (SCCO 2 ), the net present value of welfare losses from an additional ton of CO 2 , provides a useful synthesis of these damages globally, and marginal damages at the national level highlight the spatial pattern of these damages. This paper presents the PAGE-2025 integrated assessment model with 183 individual countries and five small country groups. We incorporate several critical improvements: a novel mapping of climate uncertainty to country-level warming patterns, an empirical approach to dynamic vulnerability using risk indices, updated abatement cost estimates using NGFS energy model scenarios, and an approximation of the effects of subnational heterogeneity in impacts. These changes result in a global SCCO 2 distribution with a median of $359 per ton of CO 2 . Damages are dominated by market damages, which are high in tropical regions and negative at high latitudes, and nonmarket damages, which are high in temperate regions that show the greatest rates of warming. We then decompose the spatial pattern of country-level SCCO 2 into the role of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, by calibrating a simple emulator with temperature, population, and income, which captures the country-level SCCO 2 pattern with high precision. The spatial pattern roughly follows GDP, but with tropical countries at twice their GDP-only SCCO 2 level and cooler countries below this level. We use this decomposition to evaluate the role of different modeling decisions, including different scenarios, downscaling, damage assumptions, abatement costs, and assumptions about sub-national vulnerability. Across modeling decisions, the greatest changes in spatial pattern are driven by the use of SSP scenarios (rather than the default RFFSPs) and the updating of nonmarket damages damages to reflect Howard and Sterner ( 2017 ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate Change Economics
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s201000782640004x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DRIVERS OF THE COUNTRY-LEVEL SOCIAL COST OF CARBON

James Rising
1 citations
Climate Change Economics
Climate Change Policy and Economics
3.13
article

DRIVERS OF THE COUNTRY-LEVEL SOCIAL COST OF CARBON

James Rising
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Climate change is expected to impose heterogeneous damages throughout the world due to varying levels of hazards, exposure, and vulnerability. The social cost of carbon (SCCO 2 ), the net present value of welfare losses from an additional ton of CO 2 , provides a useful synthesis of these damages globally, and marginal damages at the national level highlight the spatial pattern of these damages. This paper presents the PAGE-2025 integrated assessment model with 183 individual countries and five small country groups. We incorporate several critical improvements: a novel mapping of climate uncertainty to country-level warming patterns, an empirical approach to dynamic vulnerability using risk indices, updated abatement cost estimates using NGFS energy model scenarios, and an approximation of the effects of subnational heterogeneity in impacts. These changes result in a global SCCO 2 distribution with a median of $359 per ton of CO 2 . Damages are dominated by market damages, which are high in tropical regions and negative at high latitudes, and nonmarket damages, which are high in temperate regions that show the greatest rates of warming. We then decompose the spatial pattern of country-level SCCO 2 into the role of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, by calibrating a simple emulator with temperature, population, and income, which captures the country-level SCCO 2 pattern with high precision. The spatial pattern roughly follows GDP, but with tropical countries at twice their GDP-only SCCO 2 level and cooler countries below this level. We use this decomposition to evaluate the role of different modeling decisions, including different scenarios, downscaling, damage assumptions, abatement costs, and assumptions about sub-national vulnerability. Across modeling decisions, the greatest changes in spatial pattern are driven by the use of SSP scenarios (rather than the default RFFSPs) and the updating of nonmarket damages damages to reflect Howard and Sterner ( 2017 ).

Climate Change EconomicsVol. 17(01)
University of Delaware (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.