Extractive versus Generative Language Models for Political Conflict Text Classification

Abstract We review our recent ConfliBERT language model (Hu et al . 2022 [ConfliBERT: A Pre-Trained Language Model for Political Conflict and Violence]) to process political and violence-related texts. When fine-tuned, results show that ConfliBERT has superior performance in accuracy, precision, and recall over other large language models (LLMs) like Google’s Gemma 2 (9B), Meta’s Llama 3.1 (7B), and Alibaba’s Qwen 2.5 (14B) within its relevant domains. It is also hundreds of times faster than these more generalist LLMs. These results are illustrated using texts from the BBC, re3d, and the Global Terrorism Database. We demonstrate that open, fine-tuned models can outperform the more general models in terms of accuracy, precision, and recall, and at a fraction of the cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Analysis
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2025.10027
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extractive versus Generative Language Models for Political Conflict Text Classification

Shreyas Meher, Latifur Khan, Marcus Sianan, Patrick T. Brandt et al.
Political Analysis
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Extractive versus Generative Language Models for Political Conflict Text Classification

Shreyas Meher, Latifur Khan, Marcus Sianan, Patrick T. Brandt, Dagmar Heintze, Javier Osorio, Sultan Alsarra, Vito D’Orazio
article en

Abstract

Abstract We review our recent ConfliBERT language model (Hu et al . 2022 [ConfliBERT: A Pre-Trained Language Model for Political Conflict and Violence]) to process political and violence-related texts. When fine-tuned, results show that ConfliBERT has superior performance in accuracy, precision, and recall over other large language models (LLMs) like Google’s Gemma 2 (9B), Meta’s Llama 3.1 (7B), and Alibaba’s Qwen 2.5 (14B) within its relevant domains. It is also hundreds of times faster than these more generalist LLMs. These results are illustrated using texts from the BBC, re3d, and the Global Terrorism Database. We demonstrate that open, fine-tuned models can outperform the more general models in terms of accuracy, precision, and recall, and at a fraction of the cost.

Political Analysis
West Virginia University (US), University of Arizona (US), King Saud University (SA), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
American Political Science Association
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Extractive versus Generative Language Models for Political Conflict Text Classification — Shreyas Meher, Latifur Khan, et al. · Political Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS