Monthly Temperature Prediction in the Han River Basin, South Korea, Using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) Models

This study compares and evaluates the performance of a statistical model, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and a deep learning model, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), for predicting monthly mean temperature in the Han River Basin, South Korea. Predictor variables were dynamically selected based on lagged correlation analysis between climate indices and temperature over the past 40 years, identifying the top ten variables with the highest correlations for lag times ranging from 1 to 18 months. The MLR model was developed through stepwise regression with cross-validation, while the LSTM model was constructed using an 18-month input sequence to capture temporal dependencies in the data. Model performance was evaluated using percent bias (PBIAS), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), and tercile-based probability metrics. Both models reproduced the seasonal variability of monthly temperature with high accuracy (NSE > 0.97, r > 0.98). The LSTM model showed slightly higher predictive skill in several periods but also exhibited larger prediction variance, reflecting the sensitivity of nonlinear architectures to variations in predictor–response relationships. In contrast, the MLR model demonstrated more stable predictive behavior with narrower uncertainty bounds, particularly under low signal-to-noise conditions, owing to its structural simplicity. These findings indicate that the two approaches are complementary; the LSTM model better captures nonlinear temporal dynamics, while the MLR model provides interpretability and robustness. Future work will explore advanced hybrid architectures such as CNN–LSTM and Transformer-based models, as well as multi-model ensemble methods, to further enhance the accuracy and reliability of medium-range temperature prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18010098
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monthly Temperature Prediction in the Han River Basin, South Korea, Using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) Models

Jeong-Eun Lee, H. Y. Kim, Chul‐Gyum Kim, Jeongwoo Lee
Water
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
article

Monthly Temperature Prediction in the Han River Basin, South Korea, Using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) Models

Jeong-Eun Lee, H. Y. Kim, Chul‐Gyum Kim, Jeongwoo Lee
article en

Abstract

This study compares and evaluates the performance of a statistical model, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and a deep learning model, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), for predicting monthly mean temperature in the Han River Basin, South Korea. Predictor variables were dynamically selected based on lagged correlation analysis between climate indices and temperature over the past 40 years, identifying the top ten variables with the highest correlations for lag times ranging from 1 to 18 months. The MLR model was developed through stepwise regression with cross-validation, while the LSTM model was constructed using an 18-month input sequence to capture temporal dependencies in the data. Model performance was evaluated using percent bias (PBIAS), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r), and tercile-based probability metrics. Both models reproduced the seasonal variability of monthly temperature with high accuracy (NSE > 0.97, r > 0.98). The LSTM model showed slightly higher predictive skill in several periods but also exhibited larger prediction variance, reflecting the sensitivity of nonlinear architectures to variations in predictor–response relationships. In contrast, the MLR model demonstrated more stable predictive behavior with narrower uncertainty bounds, particularly under low signal-to-noise conditions, owing to its structural simplicity. These findings indicate that the two approaches are complementary; the LSTM model better captures nonlinear temporal dynamics, while the MLR model provides interpretability and robustness. Future work will explore advanced hybrid architectures such as CNN–LSTM and Transformer-based models, as well as multi-model ensemble methods, to further enhance the accuracy and reliability of medium-range temperature prediction.

WaterVol. 18(1)
Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KR)
Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.