Socio-ecological inequalities in housing consumption: How income, urban form, and tenure drive carbon footprints

The provision of decent housing is both a global social priority and a productive activity with long-term environmental implications. Investigating the unequal distribution of housing resources and their associated greenhouse gas emissions, from heating to materials, construction, and use, allows us to foreground housing as a key site of socio-ecological inequalities in today's economies. This paper develops a model for assessing such inequalities as they relate to the overall use of materials and energy in the provision and operation of housing. Our interdisciplinary and multidimensional analysis of housing consumption in the Netherlands brings together income, urban form, building age, tenure, and housing typology, and includes patterns of mobility and daily use. We draw on a unique combination of sources—register data about the Dutch population and housing stock, a mobility survey, and life cycle inventory data—to reveal that a) the carbon footprint per person differs starkly between richest and poorest groups; b) the low-density locations and income of richer households drive mobility emissions; c) rental units show larger carbon footprints related to lower quality housing stock; and d) suburbanization offsets emissions-saving investments in owner-occupied stock. We end by calling for further interdisciplinary research into ways to provide socially just and environmentally sustainable housing, and policy interventions to tackle excess in housing consumption, invest in social rental stock, and foster density in planning policies. • Up to 50-fold difference in carbon footprint of most and least emitting groups. • Income and sprawl of rich households drive mobility emissions in the Netherlands. • Housing tenure shapes energy use and efficiency via access to clean technology. • Lower quality rental stock induces larger building-related carbon footprints. • Suburban car use offsets emission savings of energy-efficient owner-occupied stock.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108896
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-ecological inequalities in housing consumption: How income, urban form, and tenure drive carbon footprints

Peter Berrill, Stefano Merciai, Mira Kopp, Federico Savini et al.
1 citations
Ecological Economics
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
article

Socio-ecological inequalities in housing consumption: How income, urban form, and tenure drive carbon footprints

Peter Berrill, Stefano Merciai, Mira Kopp, Federico Savini, Cody Hochstenbach, Leshem Cohen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The provision of decent housing is both a global social priority and a productive activity with long-term environmental implications. Investigating the unequal distribution of housing resources and their associated greenhouse gas emissions, from heating to materials, construction, and use, allows us to foreground housing as a key site of socio-ecological inequalities in today's economies. This paper develops a model for assessing such inequalities as they relate to the overall use of materials and energy in the provision and operation of housing. Our interdisciplinary and multidimensional analysis of housing consumption in the Netherlands brings together income, urban form, building age, tenure, and housing typology, and includes patterns of mobility and daily use. We draw on a unique combination of sources—register data about the Dutch population and housing stock, a mobility survey, and life cycle inventory data—to reveal that a) the carbon footprint per person differs starkly between richest and poorest groups; b) the low-density locations and income of richer households drive mobility emissions; c) rental units show larger carbon footprints related to lower quality housing stock; and d) suburbanization offsets emissions-saving investments in owner-occupied stock. We end by calling for further interdisciplinary research into ways to provide socially just and environmentally sustainable housing, and policy interventions to tackle excess in housing consumption, invest in social rental stock, and foster density in planning policies. • Up to 50-fold difference in carbon footprint of most and least emitting groups. • Income and sprawl of rich households drive mobility emissions in the Netherlands. • Housing tenure shapes energy use and efficiency via access to clean technology. • Lower quality rental stock induces larger building-related carbon footprints. • Suburban car use offsets emission savings of energy-efficient owner-occupied stock.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 242
Leiden University (NL), Leibniz Association (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.