Efficacy and safety profiles of monoclonal antibodies used in the therapy of Alzheimer’s disease

Introduction: Advances in molecular biology and biotechnology in recent decades have led to creation of new therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. Among the emerging therapeutic approaches, monoclonal antibodies are attracting particular attention due to their ability to modulate the accumulation of amyloid plaques and tau protein in the brain, thus proposing promising pathogenetic approach. Aim: to summarize efficacy, side effects and mortality rates of monoclonal antibodies based on the results of clinical trials in comparison with conventional therapy. Methods: All registered clinical studies related to AD treatment using monoclonal antibodies were found in ClinicalTrials.gov database. The information on adverse effects was obtained from the articles related to the third phase clinical studies, with total 21 articles included in the analysis. Data on conventional therapy were retrieved from clinical guidelines related to AD treatment. Results: We found that the number of significant side effects and mortality varies significantly for different monoclonal antibodies. For the most part, side effects are not specific to the drugs used, and therefore it is not possible to assess the direct effect of the drug on the development of certain adverse events, as well as to adequately compare the safety of different drugs, due to different mechanisms of action and recommended doses. Magnetic resonance imaging with estimation of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities changes is the most promising method for antibodies comparison, but this approach still lacks correlation with clinical course. Also, it is recommended to separately consider the side effects associated with infusion. Conclusion: The use of pathogenetic antibody therapy will improve the quality of AD treatment in the future. However, up to date, there are no unified protocols for estimation of drug effectiveness and its comparison. Evaluation of side effects and determination of antibody-specific side effects is necessary to improve the safety of treatment of patients with AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Results in Pharmacology
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18413/rrpharmacology.11.842
Primary Topic
Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety profiles of monoclonal antibodies used in the therapy of Alzheimer’s disease

Vladimir A. Mitkevich, Nikita I. Bychkovskii, Yulia V. Koledova, Alexander A. Makarov et al.
Research Results in Pharmacology
Neurological Disorders and Treatments
article

Efficacy and safety profiles of monoclonal antibodies used in the therapy of Alzheimer’s disease

Vladimir A. Mitkevich, Nikita I. Bychkovskii, Yulia V. Koledova, Alexander A. Makarov, Yuri M. Poluektov
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in molecular biology and biotechnology in recent decades have led to creation of new therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. Among the emerging therapeutic approaches, monoclonal antibodies are attracting particular attention due to their ability to modulate the accumulation of amyloid plaques and tau protein in the brain, thus proposing promising pathogenetic approach. Aim: to summarize efficacy, side effects and mortality rates of monoclonal antibodies based on the results of clinical trials in comparison with conventional therapy. Methods: All registered clinical studies related to AD treatment using monoclonal antibodies were found in ClinicalTrials.gov database. The information on adverse effects was obtained from the articles related to the third phase clinical studies, with total 21 articles included in the analysis. Data on conventional therapy were retrieved from clinical guidelines related to AD treatment. Results: We found that the number of significant side effects and mortality varies significantly for different monoclonal antibodies. For the most part, side effects are not specific to the drugs used, and therefore it is not possible to assess the direct effect of the drug on the development of certain adverse events, as well as to adequately compare the safety of different drugs, due to different mechanisms of action and recommended doses. Magnetic resonance imaging with estimation of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities changes is the most promising method for antibodies comparison, but this approach still lacks correlation with clinical course. Also, it is recommended to separately consider the side effects associated with infusion. Conclusion: The use of pathogenetic antibody therapy will improve the quality of AD treatment in the future. However, up to date, there are no unified protocols for estimation of drug effectiveness and its comparison. Evaluation of side effects and determination of antibody-specific side effects is necessary to improve the safety of treatment of patients with AD.

Research Results in PharmacologyVol. 11(4)
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology (RU), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU), Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute (RU)
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Neurological Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.