Evaluating interoperability and data quality in FHIR-based AI assessment pipelines

We present a comprehensive implementation and evaluation of a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)–based pipeline for patient-facing AI assessment. In this pipeline, patient-reported symptoms are ingested via a FHIR-compliant REST API as Observation resources, processed by an AI inference engine, and returned as structured FHIR output (e.g. Condition or DiagnosticReport resources). We performed a synthetic comparative study against a traditional, non-standardized data exchange approach (such as ad-hoc JSON or HL7 v2), measuring key metrics: data transmission latency, information completeness, and semantic integrity. Our results show that the FHIR pipeline yields substantially higher data completeness and fidelity (capturing nearly all required fields with correct coding) compared to the legacy format, at the cost of only modest increases in payload size and processing time. In numbers, the FHIR approach retained about 95% of required data fields versus ~70% for the custom pipeline, illustrating the benefit of standardized resource profiles. These findings align with prior work on FHIR-enabled data harmonization pipelines. We conclude that using FHIR standards significantly enhances data quality and interoperability for AI-driven patient assessment, providing a reusable blueprint for clinical AI system developers. All code for pipeline diagrams and performance charts (using Graphviz, Mermaid, Matplotlib, etc.) is made available to support reproducibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3100561
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating interoperability and data quality in FHIR-based AI assessment pipelines

Róża Dzierżak, Halyna Tsupryk, Oleksandr Reshetnik, Evhenia Yavorska et al.
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating interoperability and data quality in FHIR-based AI assessment pipelines

Róża Dzierżak, Halyna Tsupryk, Oleksandr Reshetnik, Evhenia Yavorska, Viktoriia Bokovets, Yaroslav Kotov
article en

Abstract

We present a comprehensive implementation and evaluation of a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)–based pipeline for patient-facing AI assessment. In this pipeline, patient-reported symptoms are ingested via a FHIR-compliant REST API as Observation resources, processed by an AI inference engine, and returned as structured FHIR output (e.g. Condition or DiagnosticReport resources). We performed a synthetic comparative study against a traditional, non-standardized data exchange approach (such as ad-hoc JSON or HL7 v2), measuring key metrics: data transmission latency, information completeness, and semantic integrity. Our results show that the FHIR pipeline yields substantially higher data completeness and fidelity (capturing nearly all required fields with correct coding) compared to the legacy format, at the cost of only modest increases in payload size and processing time. In numbers, the FHIR approach retained about 95% of required data fields versus ~70% for the custom pipeline, illustrating the benefit of standardized resource profiles. These findings align with prior work on FHIR-enabled data harmonization pipelines. We conclude that using FHIR standards significantly enhances data quality and interoperability for AI-driven patient assessment, providing a reusable blueprint for clinical AI system developers. All code for pipeline diagrams and performance charts (using Graphviz, Mermaid, Matplotlib, etc.) is made available to support reproducibility.

Vinnytsia National Technical University (UA), Ternopil Ivan Pului National Technical University (UA), Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.