Quality Assessment of a Foot-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit System to Measure On-Field Spatiotemporal Acceleration Metrics

(1) Background: The use of wearable technology for assessing running biomechanics in field-based sports has increased in recent years. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are low-cost, non-invasive devices capable of estimating spatiotemporal gait-related metrics during overground locomotion. This study evaluated the accuracy and concurrent validity of a foot-mounted IMU system for estimating sprinting kinematics. (2) Method: Twenty-five elite and sub-elite athletes completed four maximal 10-metre fly efforts, with their kinematics measured concurrently using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and IMUs. (3) Result: The foot-mounted IMU system's root mean square errors for stride length and duration were 0.22 m and 0.04 s, respectively. Mean biases (95% level of agreement) were -0.67 m · s-1 (-1.19; -0.14) for peak velocity, -0.51 m · s-1 (-1.10; 0.09) for instantaneous velocity, and 0.17 m · s-2 (-1.04; 1.37) for instantaneous acceleration. Stride length, duration, and cadence were -0.07 m (-0.36; 0.23), 0.02 s (-0.02; 0.06), and -4.64 strides · min-1 (-15.82; 6.53), respectively. (4) Conclusions: End users implementing this technology in research and practice should interpret this study's findings relative to their analytical objectives, logistical resources, and operational constraints. Therefore, its adoption should be guided by the specific performance metrics of interest and the extent to which the system's capabilities align with the outcomes the end user aims to achieve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26010246
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality Assessment of a Foot-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit System to Measure On-Field Spatiotemporal Acceleration Metrics

Grant M. Duthie, Sam Robertson, Jade Haycraft, Marco Dasso
Sensors
Sports Performance and Training
article

Quality Assessment of a Foot-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit System to Measure On-Field Spatiotemporal Acceleration Metrics

Grant M. Duthie, Sam Robertson, Jade Haycraft, Marco Dasso
article en

Abstract

(1) Background: The use of wearable technology for assessing running biomechanics in field-based sports has increased in recent years. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are low-cost, non-invasive devices capable of estimating spatiotemporal gait-related metrics during overground locomotion. This study evaluated the accuracy and concurrent validity of a foot-mounted IMU system for estimating sprinting kinematics. (2) Method: Twenty-five elite and sub-elite athletes completed four maximal 10-metre fly efforts, with their kinematics measured concurrently using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and IMUs. (3) Result: The foot-mounted IMU system's root mean square errors for stride length and duration were 0.22 m and 0.04 s, respectively. Mean biases (95% level of agreement) were -0.67 m · s-1 (-1.19; -0.14) for peak velocity, -0.51 m · s-1 (-1.10; 0.09) for instantaneous velocity, and 0.17 m · s-2 (-1.04; 1.37) for instantaneous acceleration. Stride length, duration, and cadence were -0.07 m (-0.36; 0.23), 0.02 s (-0.02; 0.06), and -4.64 strides · min-1 (-15.82; 6.53), respectively. (4) Conclusions: End users implementing this technology in research and practice should interpret this study's findings relative to their analytical objectives, logistical resources, and operational constraints. Therefore, its adoption should be guided by the specific performance metrics of interest and the extent to which the system's capabilities align with the outcomes the end user aims to achieve.

SensorsVol. 26(1)
Australian Football League (AU), Victoria University (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.